Últimas noticias sobre Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) Bolsa

WARBY PARKER INC-CLASS A

Warby Parker

Warby Parker Inc is a mission-driven, lifestyle brand that operates at the intersection of design, technology, healthcare, and social enterprise. The company predominantly derives revenue from the sales of eyewear products, optical services, and accessories. The firm sells products and services through its stores, website, and mobile apps. Revenue generated from eyewear products includes the sales of prescription and non-prescription optical glasses and sunglasses, contact lenses, eyewear accessories, and expedited shipping charges.

Stock,Market,Or,Forex,Trading,Graph,And,Candlestick,Chart,Suitable

Equities

News

Markets

PANW

QBTS

TSLA

WRBY

El Nasdaq cayó un 0,4 %, pero acciones como D-Wave y Warby Parker brillaron. Mira qué impulsó sus subidas y bajadas.

Toll Brothers, D-Wave, Palo Alto, Warby Parker, Tesla: 5 acciones que están en el radar de los inversores

Analyst Color

Analyst Ratings

BBWI

BURL

ROST

SFIX

TDUP

Sectores como Off-Price y Digital lideraron en el tercer trimestre. Descubre qué acciones destacan como grandes ganadoras.

Acciones con potencial en 2025 impulsadas por sectores digitales y tiendas de descuento

Warby Parker Inc

<p>GE Aerospace (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GE#NYSE">GE</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 32.45% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 46.73%. Currently, GE Aerospace has a market capitalization of $245.91 billion. </p>
<p><strong>Buying $1000 In GE:</strong> If an investor had bought $1000 of GE stock 5 years ago, it would be worth <strong>$6,801.53</strong> today based on a price of $230.60 for GE at the time of writing.</p>
<h3>GE Aerospace's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747953021_0.png" alt="comp_fig" /></p>
<p>Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>


Trading Ideas

Here's How Much $1000 Invested In GE Aerospace 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

WIIM

IMMX

IMMX stock has given up its prior gain. Immix Biopharma shares were trading higher after the company announced the publication of cell therapy NXC-201 Abstract #7508, selected for oral presentation at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

<p>In a world where the go-to buzzword is &#8220;disruption,&#8221; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs">one new ETF </a>is doubling down on the established players. </p>
<p><strong>Strategy Shares</strong>, in conjunction with <strong>Rareview Capital LLC</strong>, debuted the <strong>Monopoly ETF</strong> (BATS:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MPLY#BATS">MPLY</a>) on May 16, a thematic fund focused on firms with deep market roots, or to use the parlance of the fund, &#8220;monopolistic attributes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since its launch, the fund&#8217;s offering has been hit with a mix of curiosity and goal-oriented focus. Whereas most money is pursuing innovation, growth-at-all-costs, or the next breakout theme, MPLY pursues safety in dominance instead. </p>
<p>Its investment thesis relies on four characteristic attributes: <br />    •  Established brand dominance<br />    •  Regulatory exclusivity<br />    •  High entry barriers<br />     • No direct competition or limited direct competition. </p>
<p>That is to say, businesses that don&#8217;t merely compete but effectively set the rules of the game.</p>
<p><strong>Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/new-etfs/25/05/45574609/palantir-among-key-picks-as-blackrock-launches-active-defense-industrials-etf">Palantir Among Key Picks As BlackRock Launches Active Defense Industrials ETF</a></strong></p>
<h1 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Structure And Strategy</strong></h1>
<p>MPLY will have 75 to 125 holdings, diversified among sectors and sizes, with some degree of diversification despite focusing on monopolistic characteristics. Per the guidelines of the fund, the portfolio will not include regulated utilities, presumably a tip of the hat to the avoidance of price-control-subject sectors that may limit returns regardless of monopolistic market position.</p>
<h1 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>A Defensive Play In A Volatile Market</strong></h1>
<p>Rareview Capital CIO <strong>Neil Azous</strong> highlighted the fund&#8217;s possible status as a &#8220;core solution&#8221; within equity portfolios. </p>
<p>&#8220;MPLY can be a core solution and a potential replacement for a portion of a portfolio's stock market exposure. The Fund seeks to capture market upside, but may act more defensive on the downside,&#8221; Azous said. </p>
<p>&#8220;The companies the fund invests in generally have sustainable competitive advantages, tangible barriers to entry, and defensive earnings streams. As a result, they typically have the potential to generate high returns on invested capital that may compound over long periods,&#8221; Azous added. </p>
<p>That means the type of reliability investors seek amid uncertainty in markets: high returns on capital, compounded over time.</p>
<p>Essentially, MPLY is not merely about market dominance, it&#8217;s about foresight in an increasingly story-oriented market. By focusing on long-term moats instead of short-term momentum, the fund offers a defensive growth approach that might appeal to institutional investors as well as individual investors hesitant to overexpose themselves to story stocks.</p>
<h1 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Beyond The Buzz</strong></h1>
<p>While the marketing of the fund emphasizes a compelling mix of defense and innovation, invoking &#8220;Monopoly&#8221; as a branding gimmick is interesting. The label brings to mind the classic board game, as well as a genuine economic entity, so exposed to regulators. Still, the managers are sensitive to delineate their holdings as companies with &#8220;monopolistic qualities,&#8221; but not as so-called monopolies, a semantic, but possibly regulatory, distinction.</p>
<p>The true test will come in the doing: whether MPLY can balance its audacious thesis with strong performance through market cycles. For now, it presents a sharp proposition, betting not on something trendy and new, but on something big that is already dominating the board.</p>
<p><strong>Read Next: </strong></p>
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/sector-etfs/25/05/45574690/nvidia-amd-and-the-ai-arms-race-3-explosive-etfs-to-watch-right-now">Nvidia, AMD And The AI Arms Race: 3 Explosive ETFs To Watch Right Now</a></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Photo: Shutterstock</em></p>


New ETFs

ETFs

MPLY

Strategy Shares Rolls The Dice With Monopoly ETF For Market Giants

<p>CenterPoint Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CNP#NYSE">CNP</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 1.97% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 16.25%. Currently, CenterPoint Energy has a market capitalization of $24.24 billion. </p>
<p><strong>Buying $100 In CNP:</strong> If an investor had bought $100 of CNP stock 5 years ago, it would be worth <strong>$212.35</strong> today based on a price of $37.14 for CNP at the time of writing.</p>
<h3>CenterPoint Energy's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747952112_0.png" alt="comp_fig" /></p>
<p>Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>


Here's How Much $100 Invested In CenterPoint Energy 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

<p><strong>Heritage Commerce Corp (NASDAQ:</strong><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HTBK#NASDAQ"><strong>HTBK</strong></a><strong>)</strong> ("Heritage" or "Company"), parent company of Heritage Bank of Commerce (the "Bank"), a premier community business bank, today announces the appointment of Julianne Biagini-Komas as Chair of the Board of Directors (the "Board"), replacing Chairman Jack W. Conner who has assumed the role of Chair Emeritus and has indicated he intends to remain on the Board to provide a smooth and orderly transition through October 2025. Ms. Biagini-Komas, a Certified Public Accountant, has served as Vice Chair of the Board since October 2024, as a director since 2014 and as the Chair of the Audit Committee since 2020.</p>


Management

HTBK

Heritage Commerce Corp Appoints Julianne Biagini-Komas As New Chair Of The Board, Succeeding Jack W. Conner

Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Funds 3

OKLO

Shares of nuclear-linked stocks are trading higher amid report that President Trump to sign orders to boost nuclear power as soon as Friday.

<p>KBR(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KBR#NYSE">KBR</a>), a leader in human spaceflight expertise for more than 60 years, has signed a letter of intent with ACMI Properties to grow KBR's commercial space capabilities including a human spaceflight food laboratory at NASA's Exploration Park, adjacent to Johnson Space Center. The 45,000 square-foot, Houston-based facility would serve the growing commercial low-Earth orbit (LEO) industry where tailorable astronaut food systems and solutions will be designed, tested, validated, produced, and integrated into customer mission environments.</p>


Contracts

KBR Signs LOI With ACMI Properties To Expand Commercial Space Capabilities With New Human Spaceflight Food Laboratory At NASA's Exploration Park Near Johnson Space Center

<p>In the last three months, 37 analysts have published ratings on NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">13</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts have recently evaluated NVIDIA and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $172.3, accompanied by a high estimate of $220.00 and a low estimate of $100.00. Experiencing a 3.85% decline, the current average is now lower than the previous average price target of $179.19. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951279_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
<p>The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of NVIDIA by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Matt Bryson</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Arcuri</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jay Goldberg</td>
<td>Seaport Global</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Sell</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Moore</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$162.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blayne Curtis</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$155.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Arcuri</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$185.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lipacis</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Cassidy</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gil Luria</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Srini Pajjuri</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Prisco</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harsh Kumar</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Bryson</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gil Luria</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atif Malik</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
<td>$163.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joshua Buchalter</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gil Luria</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Rolland</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
<td>$180.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Prisco</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quinn Bolton</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Cassidy</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vijay Rakesh</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$168.00</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gil Luria</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Prisco</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Stein</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$205.00</td>
<td>$204.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Moore</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$162.00</td>
<td>$152.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quinn Bolton</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
<td>$160.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Cassidy</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Lipacis</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
<td>$190.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hans Mosesmann</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to NVIDIA. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of NVIDIA compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of NVIDIA's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of NVIDIA's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/NVDA/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on NVIDIA analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Delving into NVIDIA's Background</h2>
<p>Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.</p>
<h3>Financial Insights: NVIDIA</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> The company's market capitalization surpasses industry averages, showcasing a dominant size relative to peers and suggesting a strong market position.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> NVIDIA displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 January, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately <strong>77.94%</strong>. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> NVIDIA's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive <strong>56.17%</strong> net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of <strong>30.42%,</strong> the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> NVIDIA's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of <strong>21.28%,</strong> the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> NVIDIA's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of <b>0.13</b>, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
<p>Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.</p>
<p>Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.</p>
<p><strong>Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Click here to stay ahead of the market</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


NVDA

The Analyst Verdict: NVIDIA In The Eyes Of 37 Experts

<p>15 analysts have shared their evaluations of Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TNDM#NASDAQ">TNDM</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.</p>
<p>In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $33.6, with a high estimate of $63.00 and a low estimate of $20.00. Highlighting a 23.39% decrease, the current average has fallen from the previous average price target of $43.86. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951268_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
<p>A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Tandem Diabetes Care is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Joanne Wuensch</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Plovanic</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
<td>$58.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mathew Blackman</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larry Biegelsen</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt O'Brien</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeff Johnson</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Petrone</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Patrick Wood</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joanne Wuensch</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Roman</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Larry Biegelsen</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Miksic</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shagun Singh</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeff Johnson</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Plovanic</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Tandem Diabetes Care. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Tandem Diabetes Care compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts explore the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Tandem Diabetes Care's stock. This examination reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Tandem Diabetes Care's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TNDM/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on Tandem Diabetes Care analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<p>If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">you can start by tracking it here</a>.</p>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Tandem Diabetes Care</h2>
<p>Tandem Diabetes designs, manufactures, and markets durable insulin pumps for diabetes patients. The firm first entered this market in 2012 and has since introduced multiple generations of pumps leading to its current t:slim X2 device. The firm recently launched its smaller Mobi pump and continues to work on a tubeless patch pump. Nearly three-quarters of total revenue is derived from the US, with the remainder primarily from other developed nations. The pumps themselves generate just over half of total sales, and another one third is from disposable infusion sets that need to be changed over every 2 to 3 days.</p>
<h3>Key Indicators: Tandem Diabetes Care's Financial Health</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Tandem Diabetes Care displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately <strong>22.3%</strong>. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Health Care sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> The company's net margin is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of <strong>-55.69%,</strong> the company may need to address challenges in effective cost control.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Tandem Diabetes Care's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of <strong>-62.41%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of <strong>-13.82%,</strong> the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of <strong>3.18</strong>, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
<p>Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.</p>
<p>Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.</p>
<p><strong>Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag"><strong>Click here for urgent details</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


TNDM

Where Tandem Diabetes Care Stands With Analysts

<p>Throughout the last three months, 8 analysts have evaluated Moderna (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRNA#NASDAQ">MRNA</a>), offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Moderna, revealing an average target of $37.62, a high estimate of $70.00, and a low estimate of $26.00. Observing a downward trend, the current average is 16.94% lower than the prior average price target of $45.29. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951259_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
<p>An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Moderna. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Jessica Fye</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eliana Merle</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gena Wang</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Luca Issi</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cory Kasimov</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Harrison</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jessica Fye</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Geoff Meacham</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Moderna. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Moderna compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Moderna's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Moderna's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MRNA/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on Moderna analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Get to Know Moderna Better</h2>
<p>Moderna is a commercial-stage biotech that was founded in 2010 and had its initial public offering in December 2018. The firm's mRNA technology was rapidly validated with its covid vaccine, which was authorized in the United States in December 2020. Moderna had 40 mRNA development candidates in clinical development as of September 2024. Programs span a wide range of therapeutic areas, including infectious disease, oncology, cardiovascular disease, and rare genetic diseases.</p>
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: Moderna's Finances</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization:</strong> With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Moderna's revenue growth over a period of 3M has faced challenges. As of 31 March, 2025, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately <strong>-35.93%</strong>. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Health Care sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Moderna's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of <strong>-907.48%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Moderna's ROE lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maximizing returns on equity capital. With an ROE of <strong>-9.26%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial performance.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Moderna's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of <strong>-7.23%,</strong> the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> Moderna's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of <b>0.07</b>, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</p>
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
<p>Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.</p>
<p>Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.</p>
<p><strong>Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Click here to stay ahead of the market</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


MRNA

Where Moderna Stands With Analysts

<p>IBM (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBM#NYSE">IBM</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 3.02% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 17.31%. Currently, IBM has a market capitalization of $240.71 billion. </p>
<p><strong>Buying $1000 In IBM:</strong> If an investor had bought $1000 of IBM stock 5 years ago, it would be worth <strong>$2,221.57</strong> today based on a price of $259.00 for IBM at the time of writing.</p>
<h3>IBM's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951252_0.png" alt="comp_fig" /></p>
<p>Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>


$1000 Invested In IBM 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

<p>In the last three months, 4 analysts have published ratings on Vericel (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VCEL#NASDAQ">VCEL</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Vericel, presenting an average target of $59.75, a high estimate of $67.00, and a low estimate of $51.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 6.27%. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951247_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
<p>In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Vericel. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Mason Carrico</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Newitter</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$51.00</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Richard Newitter</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$61.00</td>
<td>$67.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Swayampakula Ramakanth</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Vericel. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Vericel compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Vericel's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Vericel's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/VCEL/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on Vericel analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Discovering Vericel: A Closer Look</h2>
<p>Vericel Corp is a fully integrated, commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company and a provider of therapies for the sports medicine and severe burn care markets. It markets cell therapy products in the United States, MACI (autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane); Epicel (cultured epidermal autografts); and NexoBrid. The Company operates its business in the U.S. in one reportable segment; the research, product development, manufacture, and distribution of cellular therapies and specialty biologics for use in the treatment of specific conditions.</p>
<h3>A Deep Dive into Vericel's Financials</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization:</strong> Positioned above industry average, the company's market capitalization underscores its superiority in size, indicative of a strong market presence.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Vericel's remarkable performance in 3M is evident. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of <strong>2.57%</strong>. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Health Care sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Vericel's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of <strong>-21.38%,</strong> the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Vericel's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of <strong>-3.83%,</strong> the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Vericel's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching <strong>-2.62%</strong>. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> Vericel's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of <strong>0.33</strong>.</p>
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
<p>Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.</p>
<p>Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.</p>
<p><strong>Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Click here to stay ahead of the market</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


VCEL

What Analysts Are Saying About Vericel Stock

<p>Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 4 analysts have published ratings on ZTO Express (Cayman) (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZTO#NYSE">ZTO</a>) in the last three months.</p>
<p>The following table summarizes their recent ratings, shedding light on the changing sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts have recently evaluated ZTO Express (Cayman) and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $21.65, accompanied by a high estimate of $23.00 and a low estimate of $19.00. A 13.85% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $25.13. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951234_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
<p>A clear picture of ZTO Express (Cayman)'s perception among financial experts is painted with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Lu Xu</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.60</td>
<td>$26.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fan Tso</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Parash Jain</td>
<td>HSBC</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lin Chen</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to ZTO Express (Cayman). This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of ZTO Express (Cayman) compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for ZTO Express (Cayman)'s future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into ZTO Express (Cayman)'s market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ZTO/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on ZTO Express (Cayman) analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind ZTO Express (Cayman)</h2>
<p>ZTO Express is China's largest express delivery company by parcel volume, with a volume share of 22.1% in 2022. It operates a network partner model where it provides line-haul transportation and sorting services, while its local network partners provide first-mile pickup and last-mile delivery services under the ZTO brand name. Headquartered in Shanghai, the company was founded in 2002 by Meisong Lai, who remains chair, CEO, and its major shareholder with 77% voting rights as of June 30, 2023. ZTO's strategic shareholder is leading China e-commerce company Alibaba Group with around an 11.7% interest.</p>
<h3>A Deep Dive into ZTO Express (Cayman)'s Financials</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> With a profound presence, the company's market capitalization is above industry averages. This reflects substantial size and strong market recognition.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Over the 3M period, ZTO Express (Cayman) showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of <strong>21.66%</strong> as of 31 December, 2024. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Industrials sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of <strong>19.61%,</strong> the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> ZTO Express (Cayman)'s ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching <strong>4.13%</strong>. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> ZTO Express (Cayman)'s financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of <strong>2.73%,</strong> the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at <strong>0.28</strong>.</p>
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
<p>Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.</p>
<p>In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.</p>
<p><strong>Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Click here to stay ahead of the market</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


Where ZTO Express (Cayman) Stands With Analysts

<p>In the current session, the stock is trading at $195.96, after a <strong>2.19%</strong> spike. Over the past month, <strong>Taiwan Semiconductor Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSM#NYSE">TSM</a>)</strong> stock increased by <strong>19.50%</strong>, and in the past year, by <strong>22.62%</strong>. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.</p>
<p>
</p><p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951224_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" /></p>

<h3>How Does Taiwan Semiconductor P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
<p>The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. </p>
<p>Compared to the aggregate P/E ratio of the <strong>153.45</strong> in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry, Taiwan Semiconductor Inc. has a lower P/E ratio of <strong>23.19</strong>. Shareholders might be inclined to think that  the stock might perform worse than it's industry peers. It's also possible that the stock is undervalued. </p>
<p>
</p><p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951224_1.png" alt="Guage" /></p>

<p>In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions. </p>


Intraday Update

P/E Ratio Insights for Taiwan Semiconductor

<p>Ratings for e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ELF#NYSE">ELF</a>) were provided by 12 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.</p>
<p>The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th align="right"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $82.0, a high estimate of $100.00, and a low estimate of $59.00. Observing a downward trend, the current average is 8.64% lower than the prior average price target of $89.75. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747951220_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
<p>A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive e.l.f. Beauty is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Olivia Tong</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Grom</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anna Lizzul</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joel Beatty</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Korinne Wolfmeyer</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$81.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bill Chappell</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Grom</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$59.00</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Olivia Tong</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Strong Buy</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrea Teixeira</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$127.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Korinne Wolfmeyer</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$102.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Linda Bolton Weiser</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Linda Bolton Weiser</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to e.l.f. Beauty. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of e.l.f. Beauty compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for e.l.f. Beauty's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of e.l.f. Beauty's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ELF/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Stay up to date on e.l.f. Beauty analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Discovering e.l.f. Beauty: A Closer Look</h2>
<p>e.l.f. Beauty Inc is a multi-brand beauty company that offers inclusive, accessible, clean, vegan and cruelty-free cosmetics and skin care products. The Company's mission is to make the best of beauty accessible to every eye, lip, face, and skin concern. The company offers cosmetic accessories for women which include eyeliner, mascara, false eyelashes, lipstick, the foundation for the face, moisturizer, cleanser, and other tools through its stores and e-commerce channels. The products that the company sells are marketed under the e.l.f. Cosmetics, W3LL PEOPLE and Keys Soulcare brands. It carries out sales within the US and internationally, out of which maximum revenue is generated from the US.</p>
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: e.l.f. Beauty's Finances</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Falling below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a reduced size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> e.l.f. Beauty's remarkable performance in 3M is evident. As of 31 December, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of <strong>31.14%</strong>. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Consumer Staples sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> e.l.f. Beauty's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of <strong>4.86%,</strong> the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> e.l.f. Beauty's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of <strong>2.31%</strong>, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> The company's ROA is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROA of <strong>1.38%,</strong> the company showcases effective utilization of assets.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of <strong>0.4</strong>, e.l.f. Beauty adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
<p>Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.</p>
<p>Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.</p>
<p><strong>Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?</strong></p>
<p>Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage"><strong>Click here to stay ahead of the market</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


Assessing e.l.f. Beauty: Insights From 12 Financial Analysts

PDSB

PDS Biotechnology shares are trading higher after the company announced phase 2 versamune HPV with pembrolizumab shows median overall survival of 39.3 months in CPS ≥20 patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer.

VSTM

Verastem Oncology shares are trading higher after the company announced phase 2 dose level 1 shows 83% overall response rate in frontline metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

<p><i>Selected recommended Phase 2 dose: Dose level 1 demonstrated an ORR of 83% (10/12) in frontline metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma</i></p>
<p><i>Plans for registrational Phase 3 study underway in frontline metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma</i></p>
<p><i>Company will host an R&amp;D investor webcast on Monday, June 2 at 11:00 am CDT to review the updated RAMP 205 data as well as updated data on VS-7375 presented at ASCO</i></p>
<p>Verastem Oncology (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VSTM#NASDAQ">VSTM</a>), a biopharmaceutical company committed to advancing new medicines for patients with RAS/MAPK pathway-driven cancers, today announced positive updated safety and efficacy results from the RAMP 205 Phase 1/2 trial evaluating avutometinib plus defactinib in combination with gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in the front-line for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). As of April 25, 2025, patients in the dose level 1 cohort, which was selected as the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 83% (10/12).</p>
<p>The Company will host a research and development (R&amp;D) investor webcast on Monday, June 2 at 11:00 am CDT to review the full updated data from RAMP 205 and the updated data from the Phase 1/2 study in China of VS-7375 (also known as GFH375), an oral KRAS G12D (ON/OFF) inhibitor, by partner GenFleet Therapeutics that will be presented in a rapid oral presentation at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL on June 2, 2025.</p>


Biotech

General

Verastem Oncology's Phase 2 Dose Level 1 Shows 83% Overall Response Rate In Frontline Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

<p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-sign-orders-boost-nuclear-power-soon-friday-sources-say-2025-05-22/" title="https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-sign-orders-boost-nuclear-power-soon-friday-sources-say-2025-05-22/">https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-sign-orders-boost-nuclear-power-soon-friday-sources-say-2025-05-22/</a></p>


'Trump to sign orders to boost nuclear power as soon as Friday, sources say'- Reuters

PDS Biotechnology's Phase 2 Versamune HPV With Pembrolizumab Shows Median Overall Survival Of 39.3 Months In CPS ≥20 Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic HPV16-Positive Head And Neck Cancer; Phase 3 Trial Enrolling, Data To Be Discussed In Upcoming Conference Call Ahead Of ASCO 2025 Presentation

Press Releases

Warby Parker Announces Participation in the Goldman Sachs 31st Annual Global Retailing Conference

Warby Parker to Announce Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results November 7, 2024

Warby Parker Announces Third Quarter 2024 Results

Warby Parker Announces Participation in the Morgan Stanley Global Consumer & Retail Conference

Warby Parker to Announce Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results on February 27, 2025

Warby Parker Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

Target and Warby Parker Team Up to Bring Stylish, Affordable Eyewear to More Consumers

Warby Parker to Announce First Quarter 2025 Financial Results on May 8, 2025

Warby Parker Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

Warby Parker Partners with Google To Develop Intelligent Eyewear

Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. - Common Stock

Academy Sports

BARK

Build-A-Bear Workshop

Bath & Body Works

Barnes & Noble Education, Inc Common Stock

Barnes & Noble Education

Chewy

Dick's Sporting Goods

Envela

National Vision Holdings, Inc. - Common Stock

National Vision Holdings

Five Below

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. - Class A Common Stock

1-800-Flowers.com

Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. Class A Common Stock

Grove Collaborative Hldgs

MarineMax

Leslies

PetMed Express

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (Name to be changed from Sally Holdings, Inc.) Common Stock

Comments

Warby Parker

Noticias

Últimas noticias sobre Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) Bolsa

La gente también mira

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL