El interés en corto de Frontier Group Holdings da a los inversores una idea del grado en que los inversores apuestan por la caída de las acciones de Frontier Group Holdings. Los datos de interés en corto se actualizan cada dos semanas.

Frontier Group Holdings (NASDAQ:ULCC) Bolsa, Informe de interés en corto

Frontier Group Holdings

Frontier Group Holdings Inc is an ultra-low-cost carrier whose business is focused on Low Fares Done Right. The company owns a fleet of 120 Airbus single-aisle aircraft, consisting of 13 A320ceos, 82 A320neos, 21 A321ceos and 4 A321neos. The use of these aircraft, their seating configuration, weight-saving tactics, and baggage process have all contributed to the ability to continue to be the fuel-efficient of all the U.S. The Company is managed as a single business unit that provides air transportation for passengers. Majority of revenue is from Domestic flight follow by International.

Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. - Common Stock

Frontier Group Holdings Inc

David Bailey's newly formed Bitcoin (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/btc/usd">BTC</a>)-<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/05/45349057/strategy-buys-134b-in-bitcoin-at-99856-cites-155-btc-yield">native holding company</a>, Nakamoto Holdings Inc., on Monday announced a definitive merger with Nasdaq-listed healthcare firm KindlyMD (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KDLY#NASDAQ">KDLY</a>).
What Happened: The combined <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250511707064/en/David-Bailey-and-Bitcoin-Native-Holding-Company-Nakamoto-Announce-Merger-with-KindlyMD-to-Establish-Bitcoin-Treasury">entity</a> will establish a public-market Bitcoin treasury vehicle following a $710 million capital raise, consisting of $510 million in PIPE financing and $200 million in convertible notes, marking the largest capital raise of its kind for a crypto-related public transaction to date.
Bailey, who also heads BTC Inc. and Bitcoin investment firm UTXO Management, will serve as CEO of the merged company. 
The move formalizes Nakamoto's strategy to bring Bitcoin into the structure of public equity and debt markets, positioning itself as a Bitcoin treasury-centric holding company operating within existing financial systems.
The transaction will also give public investors exposure to Bitcoin holdings through a regulated corporate structure. 
"Nakamoto seeks to be the first publicly traded conglomerate designed to accelerate that future," Bailey said. "Our mission is to list Bitcoin-backed instruments on every major exchange."
KindlyMD, which operates a network of healthcare clinics focused on holistic pain management, will continue to run its existing medical operations independently under CEO Tim Pickett. 
However, the primary aim of the merger lies in building out a scalable Bitcoin treasury infrastructure at the holding company level, backed by a wide pool of global investors.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/05/45344022/bitcoin-taps-105000-heres-when-it-could-hit-122000">Bitcoin Taps $105,000: Here&#8217;s When It Could Hit $122,000</a>
Why It Matters: The $510 million PIPE deal attracted over 200 institutional and individual investors from six continents.
Named participants include Van Eck, ParaFi, Kingsway, and Arrington Capital, along with crypto figures such as Adam Back and Jihan Wu. 
The $200 million in senior secured convertible notes were purchased solely by Yorkville Advisors.
Once completed, the combined company will continue to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker "KDLY" until a new name and ticker are adopted. 
The board will be comprised of six Nakamoto appointees and one from KindlyMD. 
The merger is subject to shareholder approval and standard closing conditions.
Nakamoto's stated goal is to grow its Bitcoin holdings and "Bitcoin yield" per share via equity and debt offerings. 
Its business model intends to use treasury-backed instruments such as common stock, preferred shares, and hybrid financial products to integrate Bitcoin into capital markets infrastructure. 
The company has also assumed a marketing agreement with BTC Inc. to promote its strategy across Bitcoin-native platforms.
Read Next: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/05/45344686/can-the-us-china-tariff-de-escalation-send-bitcoin-ethereum-to-new-highs">Can The US-China Tariff De-Escalation Send Bitcoin, Ethereum To New Highs?</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

News

$BTC

KDLY

Nakamoto Holdings Raises $710M, Merges With KindlyMD To Build Bitcoin Treasury Holding Company

PacBio (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PACB#NASDAQ">PACB</a>) today announced that the Special Committee of its Board of Directors (the "Special Committee") has concluded its independent investigation into previously disclosed allegations from an attorney representing an employee impacted by our recent reduction in force regarding certain employment practices and cybersecurity matters of the Company. The allegations did not involve the current, or any previously reported, financial results, and the investigation found no improper employment practices and no material inaccuracies or omissions with respect to the cybersecurity disclosures in the Company's 2024 Form 10-K.

PACB

PacBio Independent Investigation Finds No Issues in Employment & Cybersecurity Matters

Arthur J. Gallagher (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AJG#NYSE">AJG</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 4.89% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 13.11%. Currently, Arthur J. Gallagher has a market capitalization of $87.17 billion. 
Buying $100 In AJG: If an investor had bought $100 of AJG stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $1,184.20 today based on a price of $340.85 for AJG at the time of writing.
<h3>Arthur J. Gallagher's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062088_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

$100 Invested In This Stock 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Scotiabank analyst Jonathan Goldman maintains Cascades (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CAS#TSX">CAS</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from C$11.5 to C$10.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

TSX:CAS

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Cascades, Lowers Price Target to C$10

Morgan Stanley analyst Angel Castillo maintains Vulcan Materials (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VMC#NYSE">VMC</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $273 to $303.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Vulcan Materials, Raises Price Target to $303

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>31.44</td>
<td>6.70</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>$36.48</td>
<td>$78.69</td>
<td>8.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>18.17</td>
<td>2.16</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>5.01%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>7.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.42</td>
<td>3.59</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$32.41</td>
<td>$62.81</td>
<td>24.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>24.82</td>
<td>5.55</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$2.75</td>
<td>37.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>9.11</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>0.32</td>
<td>4.21%</td>
<td>$12.54</td>
<td>$53.12</td>
<td>13.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>185.71</td>
<td>10.80</td>
<td>1.53</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$2.32</td>
<td>11.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>16.71</td>
<td>6.47</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>9.95%</td>
<td>$0.77</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>1.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>6.96</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>6.31%</td>
<td>$3.29</td>
<td>$7.63</td>
<td>-4.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>32.87</td>
<td>3.85</td>
<td>2.89</td>
<td>4.14%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>2.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.92</td>
<td>4.23</td>
<td>2.61</td>
<td>8.12%</td>
<td>$0.99</td>
<td>$2.22</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>9.78</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>-4.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>14.02</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>15.61%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.69</td>
<td>-2.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>5.61</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$0.68</td>
<td>$3.02</td>
<td>-4.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>78.86</td>
<td>4.20</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>-1.13%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>6.85</td>
<td>0.20</td>
<td>0.05</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>-9.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>66</td>
<td>8.99</td>
<td>0.34</td>
<td>-25.78%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>-8.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>5.3</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>4.94%</td>
<td>$7.48</td>
<td>$17.21</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of Amazon.com, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 31.44 significantly below the industry average by 0.88x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 6.7 relative to the industry average by 1.26x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.19, surpassing the industry average by 1.93x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 5.79% that is 0.85% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.48 Billion is 4.88x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $78.69 Billion, which indicates 4.57x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 8.62%, outperforming the industry average of 6.1%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062057_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining Amazon.com in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com in the Broadline Retail industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting a premium valuation based on book value and sales. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong profitability and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

AMZN

Investigating Amazon.com's Standing In Broadline Retail Industry Compared To Competitors

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) and its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>30.92</td>
<td>44.39</td>
<td>7.54</td>
<td>37.11%</td>
<td>$32.25</td>
<td>$44.87</td>
<td>5.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>8.12</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$2.29</td>
<td>16.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>17.41</td>
<td>2.99</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>1.72%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-18.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>17.31</td>
<td>19.38</td>
<td>3.03</td>
<td>31.69%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>2.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>157.10</td>
<td>12.19</td>
<td>5.27</td>
<td>3.12%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>15.10</td>
<td>2.97</td>
<td>0.99</td>
<td>5.86%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$0.91</td>
<td>30.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>5.99</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>0.48</td>
<td>2.46%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-3.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>13.74</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>18.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>46.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>33.54</td>
<td>5.84</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>9.34%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>12.18%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Apple, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 30.92 is lower than the industry average by 0.92x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 44.39 which exceeds the industry average by 7.6x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 7.54, which is 4.38x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 37.11% that is 27.77% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.25 Billion is 94.85x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $44.87 Billion, which indicates 54.72x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 5.08% is significantly below the industry average of 12.18%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062048_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Apple against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
When evaluating the debt-to-equity ratio, Apple is in the middle position among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company maintains a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.47, suggesting a relatively balanced financial structure.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Apple And Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

ARM Holdings's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARM#NYSE">ARM</a>) short percent of float has fallen 8.83% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 15.09 million shares sold short, which is 11.77% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.91 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>ARM Holdings Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062041_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for ARM Holdings has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing ARM Holdings's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, ARM Holdings's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 5.03%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Peering Into ARM Holdings's Recent Short Interest

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) and its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>23.16</td>
<td>8.05</td>
<td>9.06</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$22.52</td>
<td>$34.74</td>
<td>16.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>17.05</td>
<td>5.37</td>
<td>5.21</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$46.31</td>
<td>$53.87</td>
<td>12.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>9.52</td>
<td>0.82</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>1.76%</td>
<td>$7.22</td>
<td>$16.11</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reddit Inc</td>
<td>21.74</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>13.34</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>61.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>4.22</td>
<td>5.45</td>
<td>0.19%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>15.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>33.03</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>3.05%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$1.51</td>
<td>15.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>116.88</td>
<td>1.87</td>
<td>2.79</td>
<td>0.87%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-2.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CarGurus Inc</td>
<td>84</td>
<td>7.64</td>
<td>3.62</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Autohome Inc</td>
<td>13.65</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>3.14</td>
<td>1.25%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>-6.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>19.11</td>
<td>3.45</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>3.31%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>-0.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>7.36</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>38.51</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>-1.39%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>0.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>17.66</td>
<td>0.73</td>
<td>0.96</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yalla Group Ltd</td>
<td>9.73</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>3.88</td>
<td>4.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taboola.com Ltd</td>
<td>83.50</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>-0.85%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>3.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>34.46</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>3.72</td>
<td>2.61%</td>
<td>$3.9</td>
<td>$5.42</td>
<td>8.37%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When analyzing Meta Platforms, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 23.16, which is 0.67x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 8.05 relative to the industry average by 2.59x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.06, which is 2.44x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.05%, which is 6.44% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.52 Billion, which is 5.77x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $34.74 Billion, which indicates 6.41x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.07%, outperforming the industry average of 8.37%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062039_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Meta Platforms stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The PE, PB, and PS ratios for Meta Platforms indicate that it may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong financial performance relative to industry standards. This suggests that while the stock may be trading at a premium based on traditional valuation metrics, its operational efficiency and growth potential are favorable.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Understanding Meta Platforms's Position In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry Compared To Competitors

Entergy's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ETR#NYSE">ETR</a>) short percent of float has fallen 13.58% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 9.87 million shares sold short, which is 2.61% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.96 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Entergy Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062036_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Entergy has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Entergy's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Entergy's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 2.46%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Peering Into Entergy's Recent Short Interest

In the current session, the stock is trading at $185.08, after a 5.90% increase. Over the past month, Powell Industries Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/POWL#NASDAQ">POWL</a>) stock increased by 6.79%, and in the past year, by 16.34%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062033_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>Evaluating Powell Industries P/E in Comparison to Its Peers</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
Powell Industries has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 42.63 of the Electrical Equipment industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062033_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

POWL

Price Over Earnings Overview: Powell Industries

McKesson's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MCK#NYSE">MCK</a>) short percent of float has risen 14.47% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 2.17 million shares sold short, which is 1.74% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.59 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>McKesson Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062031_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for McKesson has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing McKesson's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, McKesson's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.59%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

What Does the Market Think About McKesson?

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.90</td>
<td>10.13</td>
<td>12.13</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$40.71</td>
<td>$48.15</td>
<td>13.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>35.29</td>
<td>25.20</td>
<td>7.70</td>
<td>19.27%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>132.98</td>
<td>20.01</td>
<td>17.85</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>18.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>105.61</td>
<td>19.41</td>
<td>15.46</td>
<td>4.35%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$1.66</td>
<td>14.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>40.09</td>
<td>37.99</td>
<td>12.27</td>
<td>25.08%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>13.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>28.07</td>
<td>7.85</td>
<td>4.58</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>2.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>448.77</td>
<td>13.71</td>
<td>15.01</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>32.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>101.55</td>
<td>23.15</td>
<td>7.74</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>28.54</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>3.61%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>1.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>27.06</td>
<td>9.65</td>
<td>7.90</td>
<td>9.75%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>9.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>47.95</td>
<td>6.07</td>
<td>3.35</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>28.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>15.94</td>
<td>13.60</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>30.24%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>62.85</td>
<td>91.19</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>-25.97%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>5.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>3.02</td>
<td>-0.93%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>3.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>89.9</td>
<td>20.96</td>
<td>7.97</td>
<td>7.03%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>11.54%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 33.9 significantly below the industry average by 0.38x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 10.13, which is 0.48x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 12.13, which is 1.52x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.27%, which is 1.24% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $40.71 Billion, which is 61.68x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $48.15 Billion, which indicates 35.4x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 13.27% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 11.54%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062029_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Microsoft and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the company is undervalued compared to its peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies that the stock may be overvalued based on its revenue. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth rates indicate strong financial performance and growth potential within the industry sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

It was revealed in a recent SEC filing that Carrie M Fox, Director at Civitas Resources (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CIVI#NYSE">CIVI</a>) made a noteworthy insider purchase on May 12,.
What Happened: A Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001509589/000184083825000003//Archives/edgar/data/1509589/000184083825000003/0001840838-25-000003-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Monday unveiled that Fox made a notable purchase of 18,076 shares of Civitas Resources, valuing at $501,055.
Monitoring the market, Civitas Resources's shares up by 8.46% at $30.0 during Monday's morning.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Civitas Resources</h3>
Civitas Resources Inc is an independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and associated liquids-rich natural gas in the Rocky Mountain region, in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado - DJ Basin. The company's operations are focused on developing the horizontal Niobrara and Codell formations that have a low-cost structure, mature infrastructure, production efficiencies, multiple producing horizons, multiple service providers, established reserves, and prospective drilling opportunities.
<h3>Civitas Resources's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Revenue Growth: Civitas Resources's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 31 March, 2025, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -7.72%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company shows a low gross margin of 39.6%, indicating concerns regarding cost management and overall profitability relative to its industry counterparts.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): The company excels with an EPS that surpasses the industry average. With a current EPS of 1.99, Civitas Resources showcases strong earnings per share.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 0.76, Civitas Resources faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
Financial Valuation Breakdown:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: With a lower-than-average P/E ratio of 3.18, the stock indicates an attractive valuation, potentially presenting a buying opportunity.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 0.53 is below industry norms, suggesting potential undervaluation and presenting an investment opportunity for those considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With an EV/EBITDA ratio lower than industry benchmarks at 2.15, Civitas Resources presents an attractive value opportunity.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Impact of Insider Transactions on Investments</h3>
Insider transactions serve as a piece of the puzzle in investment decisions, rather than the entire picture.
When discussing legal matters, the term "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, as stipulated in Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and significant hedge funds. Such insiders are required to report their transactions through a Form 4 filing, which must be completed within two business days of the transaction.
A new purchase by a company insider is a indication that they anticipate the stock will rise.
On the other hand, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Essential Transaction Codes Unveiled</h3>
For <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a>, a primary focus lies on transactions occurring in the open market, as indicated in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001509589">Check Out The Full List Of Civitas Resources's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

CIVI

Carrie M Fox's Recent Buy: Acquires $501K In Civitas Resources Stock

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>39.68</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>22.17</td>
<td>30.42%</td>
<td>$25.82</td>
<td>$28.72</td>
<td>77.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>96.39</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>18.41</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
<td>$8.54</td>
<td>$10.14</td>
<td>24.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>75.07</td>
<td>2.88</td>
<td>6.05</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$1.59</td>
<td>$3.74</td>
<td>35.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>14.81</td>
<td>5.75</td>
<td>3.86</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$3.67</td>
<td>$6.04</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>32.63</td>
<td>9.54</td>
<td>9.86</td>
<td>7.08%</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>11.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>154.40</td>
<td>17.85</td>
<td>30.72</td>
<td>3.17%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>26.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>66.30</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$1.03</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-3.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>20.54</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>3.09</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.96</td>
<td>38.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>17.01</td>
<td>9.35</td>
<td>12.99</td>
<td>4.17%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>39.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>1.82</td>
<td>0.32%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-27.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>18.61</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>1.02</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$27.16</td>
<td>$24.89</td>
<td>11.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>12.15</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>2.38</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$23.86</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>5.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>28.46</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>-5.78%</td>
<td>$-0.37</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>-22.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>11.95</td>
<td>1.84</td>
<td>3.55</td>
<td>2.59%</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>26.64</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>2.78</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-8.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>1693.33</td>
<td>13.95</td>
<td>27.36</td>
<td>4.95%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>154.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>4.12</td>
<td>10.57</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>126.19</td>
<td>2.02</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>0.93%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-5.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>134.14</td>
<td>9.64</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>0.71%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-14.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>143.27</td>
<td>5.8</td>
<td>9.12</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$4.06</td>
<td>$3.93</td>
<td>16.07%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of NVIDIA, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
At 39.68, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.28x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 35.88, which is 6.19x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 22.17, which is 2.43x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 30.42% that is 27.55% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $25.82 Billion, which is 6.36x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $28.72 Billion, which indicates 7.31x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 77.94% exceeds the industry average of 16.07%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062020_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, NVIDIA has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, NVIDIA outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial health and growth prospects.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Comparative Study: NVIDIA And Industry Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Antalpha Platform Holding Company (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ANTA#NASDAQ">ANTA</a>) IPO will take place May, 13 on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker ANTA.
The company is offering shares at an expected price between $11.00 and $13.00 per share with an insider lock-up period of 180 days ending on November 09, 2025.
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/ipos">Benzinga IPO Calendar</a>
<h3>About Antalpha Platform Holding Company</h3>
Antalpha provides financing, technology and risk management solutions to the digital asset industry. As the primary lending partner for Bitmain, we are a provider of supply chain financing solutions to institutional and corporate participants in the Bitcoin mining industry, offering loans secured by Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining machines
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">Benzinga's Most Shorted Stocks</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

IPOs

ANTA

Antalpha Platform Holding Company IPOs Tomorrow, Here's What You Need To Know

May 9, 2025 records indicate that Representative Jared Moskowitz filed a purchase of AbbVie (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ABBV#NYSE">ABBV</a>), valued between $27,027 and $405,000. According to the May filing, the transaction occurred on May 9, 2025.
Currently, AbbVie shares are trading up 2.18% at $188.62.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
Over the previous three years, Jared Moskowitz conducted 310 trades, totaling more than $633 thousand. The largest of these were in Raymond James Finl and Seacoast Banking stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Jared Moskowitz's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA</td>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elevance Health</td>
<td>ELV</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Stay informed on Jared Moskowitz's trades and other members of Congress with our real-time <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/jared-moskowitz">government trades tracking tool</a>!
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

ABBV

AVGO

Congressional Trading Report: Rep. Jared Moskowitz Bought Over $27K In AbbVie Stock

Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson maintains Canfor Pulp Products (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFX#TSX">CFX</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from C$1.25 to C$1.

TSX:CFX

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Canfor Pulp Products, Lowers Price Target to C$1

Morgan Stanley analyst Angel Castillo maintains WillScot Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WSC#NASDAQ">WSC</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $38 to $39.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Overweight on WillScot Holdings, Raises Price Target to $39

Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson maintains Canfor (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFP#TSX">CFP</a>) with a Sector Underperform and lowers the price target from C$15 to C$14.

TSX:CFP

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Underperform on Canfor, Lowers Price Target to C$14

Press Releases

Frontier Airlines Confirms Compelling Proposal to Combine With Spirit Airlines

Earnings

Frontier Airlines Reports Solid Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Results on Record Revenue

Frontier Airlines to Participate in the Barclays 42nd Annual Industrial Select Conference

Frontier Group Holdings Reschedules Webcast at the Barclays 42nd Annual Industrial Select Conference

Frontier Airlines Joins JFK Terminal 6 for Operations in 2026

Frontier Airlines Is Ready to Be Your New Love: Low Fares, Free Bags, and More!

Frontier Group Holdings Announces Webcast of First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

Fareportal and Frontier Airlines Launch NDC API to Offer Travelers More Personalized Options

Frontier Airlines Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

Frontier Airlines Launches Unlimited Companion Travel Benefit for Its Most Frequent Flyers

ULCC

American Airlines Group, Inc. - Common Stock

American Airlines Group

Allegiant Travel

Alaska Air Gr

Azul S.A. American Depositary Shares (each representing three preferred shares)

Azul

Blade Air Mobility, Inc. - Class A Common Stock

Blade Air Mobility

Copa Holdings

Delta Air Lines

flyExclusive

JetBlue Airways Corporation - Common Stock

JetBlue Airways

Joby Aviation

Jet AI

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. American Depositary Shares (each representing two thousand (2,000) shares of Common Stock)

LATAM Airlines Group

Southwest Airlines

Mesa Air Gr

Ryanair Holdings plc - American Depositary Shares, each representing five Ordinary Shares

Ryanair Hldgs

SkyWest

Sun Country Airlines Holdings, Inc. - Common Stock

Sun Country Airlines

Volato Group

Surf Air Mobility

United Airlines Holdings, Inc. - Common Stock

United Airlines Holdings

Wheels Up Experience Inc. Class A Common Stock

Wheels Up Experience

Controladora Vuela Compania de Aviacion, S.A.B. de C.V. American Depositary Shares, each representing ten (10) Ordinary Participation Certificates

Comments

Frontier Group Holdings

Interés en corto

Frontier Group Holdings (NASDAQ:ULCC) Bolsa, Informe de interés en corto

La gente también mira

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL