El interés en corto de Structure Therapeutics da a los inversores una idea del grado en que los inversores apuestan por la caída de las acciones de Structure Therapeutics. Los datos de interés en corto se actualizan cada dos semanas.

Structure Therapeutics (NASDAQ:GPCR) Bolsa, Informe de interés en corto

STRUCTURE THERAPEUTICS INC

Structure Therapeutics

Structure Therapeutics Inc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel oral small-molecule therapeutics to treat a wide range of chronic diseases with unmet medical needs. Its differentiated technology platform leverages both structure-based drug discovery and expertise in computational chemistry to discover and develop small molecule therapeutics against G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The group operates and manages its business as one reportable and operating segment, which is the business of research and development of medicines that target chronic diseases with unmet medical needs.

Structure Therapeutics Inc. - American Depositary Shares

Structure Therapeutics Inc

Investors with a lot of money to spend have taken a bullish stance on Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OXY#NYSE">OXY</a>).
And retail traders should know.
We noticed this today when the trades showed up on publicly available options history that we track here at Benzinga.
Whether these are institutions or just wealthy individuals, we don't know. But when something this big happens with OXY, it often means somebody knows something is about to happen.
So how do we know what these investors just did? 
Today, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga</a>'s options scanner spotted 16 uncommon options trades for Occidental Petroleum.
This isn't normal.
The overall sentiment of these big-money traders is split between 56% bullish and 31%, bearish.
Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 9 are puts, for a total amount of $561,053, and 7 are calls, for a total amount of $655,950.
<h3>Predicted Price Range</h3>
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $37.5 to $70.0 for Occidental Petroleum over the recent three months. 
<h3>Analyzing Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
In today's trading context, the average open interest for options of Occidental Petroleum stands at 3372.07, with a total volume reaching 8,988.00. The accompanying chart delineates the progression of both call and put option volume and open interest for high-value trades in Occidental Petroleum, situated within the strike price corridor from $37.5 to $70.0, throughout the last 30 days.
<h3>Occidental Petroleum Option Volume And Open Interest Over Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692495_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Largest Options Trades Observed:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>OXY</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$2.75</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$274.6K</td>
<td>2.8K</td>
<td>1.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OXY</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$4.2</td>
<td>$3.4</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$197.5K</td>
<td>6.6K</td>
<td>500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OXY</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>08/15/25</td>
<td>$3.15</td>
<td>$3.05</td>
<td>$3.05</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$152.5K</td>
<td>1.9K</td>
<td>547</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OXY</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$4.0</td>
<td>$3.85</td>
<td>$3.85</td>
<td>$47.50</td>
<td>$109.3K</td>
<td>4.7K</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OXY</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$2.13</td>
<td>$1.82</td>
<td>$2.05</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$102.5K</td>
<td>9.7K</td>
<td>501</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Occidental Petroleum</h3>
Occidental Petroleum is an independent exploration and production company with operations in the United States, Latin America, and the Middle East. At the end of 2023, the company reported net proved reserves of nearly 4 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged 1,327 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2024 at a ratio of roughly 50% oil and natural gas liquids and 50% natural gas.
In light of the recent options history for Occidental Petroleum, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Current Position of Occidental Petroleum</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 5,073,250, the OXY's price is down by -8.25%, now at $45.26. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently is currently neutral between overbought and oversold.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 34 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What The Experts Say On Occidental Petroleum</h3>
5 market experts have recently issued ratings for this stock, with a consensus target price of $55.0.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from JP Morgan has decided to maintain their Neutral rating on Occidental Petroleum, which currently sits at a price target of $52. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Morgan Stanley keeps a Overweight rating on Occidental Petroleum with a target price of $58. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Piper Sandler continues to hold a Neutral rating for Occidental Petroleum, targeting a price of $50. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Citigroup continues to hold a Neutral rating for Occidental Petroleum, targeting a price of $51. 
&#x2A; Reflecting concerns, an analyst from Raymond James lowers its rating to Outperform with a new price target of $64.
Trading options involves greater risks but also offers the potential for higher profits. Savvy traders mitigate these risks through ongoing education, strategic trade adjustments, utilizing various indicators, and staying attuned to market dynamics. Keep up with the latest options trades for Occidental Petroleum with <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> for real-time alerts.

Options

Markets

Occidental Petroleum Unusual Options Activity

Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bearish stance on Roku.
Looking at options history for Roku (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ROKU#NASDAQ">ROKU</a>) we detected 17 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 35% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 52% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 11 are puts, for a total amount of $715,420 and 6, calls, for a total amount of $281,337.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Analyzing the Volume and Open Interest in these contracts, it seems that the big players have been eyeing a price window from $50.0 to $100.0 for Roku during the past quarter. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Development</h3>
Examining the volume and open interest provides crucial insights into stock research. This information is key in gauging liquidity and interest levels for Roku's options at certain strike prices. Below, we present a snapshot of the trends in volume and open interest for calls and puts across Roku's significant trades, within a strike price range of $50.0 to $100.0, over the past month.
<h3>Roku Call and Put Volume: 30-Day Overview</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692490_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$22.5</td>
<td>$22.0</td>
<td>$22.5</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$168.7K</td>
<td>2</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$4.6</td>
<td>$4.55</td>
<td>$4.6</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$124.6K</td>
<td>273</td>
<td align="right">283</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/11/25</td>
<td>$6.5</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
<td>$86.0K</td>
<td>238</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$7.6</td>
<td>$7.0</td>
<td>$7.42</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$74.2K</td>
<td>12.1K</td>
<td align="right">962</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$7.3</td>
<td>$7.05</td>
<td>$7.3</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$73.0K</td>
<td>12.1K</td>
<td align="right">462</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Roku</h3>
Roku enables consumers to stream television programming. It has more than 90 million streaming households and provided 127 billion streaming hours in 2024. Roku is the top streaming operating system in the US, reaching more than half of broadband households, according to the company. Roku's OS is built into streaming devices and televisions that Roku sells and on connected televisions from other manufacturers that license Roku's name and software. Roku also operates the Roku Channel, a free, ad-supported streaming television platform that offers a mix of on-demand and live television programming. Roku generates revenue primarily from selling devices, licensing, and advertising, and it receives fees from subscription streaming platforms that sell subscriptions through Roku.
<h3>Current Position of Roku</h3>
<ul>
<li>Trading volume stands at 2,240,568, with ROKU's price down by -14.47%, positioned at $61.09.</li>
<li>RSI indicators show the stock to be is currently neutral between overbought and oversold.</li>
<li>Earnings announcement expected in 21 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What Analysts Are Saying About Roku</h3>
In the last month, 2 experts released ratings on this stock with an average target price of $117.5.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Needham has revised its rating downward to Buy, adjusting the price target to $120. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Citizens Capital Markets downgraded its action to Market Outperform with a price target of $115. 
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Roku options trades with real-time alerts from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>.

ROKU

Roku Unusual Options Activity

Financial giants have made a conspicuous bearish move on Five Below. Our analysis of options history for Five Below (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FIVE#NASDAQ">FIVE</a>) revealed 8 unusual trades.
Delving into the details, we found 37% of traders were bullish, while 62% showed bearish tendencies. Out of all the trades we spotted, 6 were puts, with a value of $265,344, and 2 were calls, valued at $63,980.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Analyzing the Volume and Open Interest in these contracts, it seems that the big players have been eyeing a price window from $55.0 to $75.0 for Five Below during the past quarter. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Trends</h3>
In terms of liquidity and interest, the mean open interest for Five Below options trades today is 929.0 with a total volume of 1,981.00.
In the following chart, we are able to follow the development of volume and open interest of call and put options for Five Below's big money trades within a strike price range of $55.0 to $75.0 over the last 30 days.
<h3>Five Below 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692485_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Noteworthy Options Activity:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>FIVE</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$12.8</td>
<td>$12.7</td>
<td>$12.7</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$92.7K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FIVE</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$1.9</td>
<td>$1.95</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$48.8K</td>
<td>331</td>
<td align="right">288</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FIVE</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$12.6</td>
<td>$12.1</td>
<td>$12.6</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$35.6K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
<td align="right">120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FIVE</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/17/25</td>
<td>$3.9</td>
<td>$3.5</td>
<td>$3.83</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$32.6K</td>
<td>2</td>
<td align="right">185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FIVE</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$6.8</td>
<td>$5.5</td>
<td>$6.4</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$32.0K</td>
<td>202</td>
<td align="right">110</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Five Below</h3>
Five Below Inc is a specialty value retailer offering merchandise targeted at the tween and teen demographic. The Company's edited assortment of products includes select brands and licensed merchandise. It derives revenue from sales of the Company's merchandise to customers.
In light of the recent options history for Five Below, it's now appropriate to focus on the company itself. We aim to explore its current performance.
<h3>Five Below's Current Market Status</h3>
<ul>
<li>Currently trading with a volume of 3,860,474, the FIVE's price is down by -28.97%, now at $57.88. </li>
<li>RSI readings suggest the stock is currently may be oversold.</li>
<li>Anticipated earnings release is in 62 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What The Experts Say On Five Below</h3>
A total of 5 professional analysts have given their take on this stock in the last 30 days, setting an average price target of $94.2.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Loop Capital continues to hold a Hold rating for Five Below, targeting a price of $75. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Truist Securities keeps a Hold rating on Five Below with a target price of $86. 
&#x2A; An analyst from B of A Securities has decided to maintain their Underperform rating on Five Below, which currently sits at a price target of $75. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Guggenheim persists with their Buy rating on Five Below, maintaining a target price of $125. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Morgan Stanley keeps a Equal-Weight rating on Five Below with a target price of $110. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Five Below, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

FIVE

Five Below Unusual Options Activity

WIIM

OSRH

OSR Holdings shares are trading higher after the company announced it entered into a $80 million common stock purchase agreement with White Lion GMB Innovation Fund.

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>35.54</td>
<td>50.38</td>
<td>8.66</td>
<td>58.74%</td>
<td>$45.91</td>
<td>$58.27</td>
<td>3.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>7.75</td>
<td>0.84</td>
<td>0.70</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$2.29</td>
<td>16.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>15.26</td>
<td>3.34</td>
<td>1.07</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>54.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>16.76</td>
<td>18.77</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>31.69%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>2.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>148.42</td>
<td>11.48</td>
<td>4.98</td>
<td>3.12%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>12.08</td>
<td>1.20</td>
<td>0.92</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>41.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>6.96</td>
<td>0.79</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>2.46%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-3.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>19.31</td>
<td>2.49</td>
<td>0.84</td>
<td>18.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>46.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>17.53</td>
<td>0.73</td>
<td>0.44</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>30.51</td>
<td>4.96</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>8.53%</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>22.16%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Apple, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 35.54 for this company is 1.16x above the industry average, indicating a premium valuation associated with the stock.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 50.38 which exceeds the industry average by 10.16x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 8.66, which is 5.59x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 58.74% that is 50.21% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.91 Billion, which is 117.72x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $58.27 Billion, which indicates 73.76x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 3.95%, which is much lower than the industry average of 22.16%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692466_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating Apple against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
Apple is positioned in the middle in terms of the debt-to-equity ratio compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also relying on equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to peers, indicating a potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, Apple's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest strong profitability and operational efficiency relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

News

Trading Ideas

AAPL

Market Analysis: Apple And Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

Benchmark analyst Mark Zgutowicz reiterates Stagwell (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/STGW#NASDAQ">STGW</a>) with a Buy and maintains $10 price target.

Price Target

Reiteration

Analyst Ratings

STGW

Benchmark Reiterates Buy on Stagwell, Maintains $10 Price Target

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) and its primary competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>35.44</td>
<td>7.26</td>
<td>3.29</td>
<td>7.34%</td>
<td>$38.55</td>
<td>$37.37</td>
<td>10.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>18.90</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>2.34</td>
<td>5.01%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>7.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>11.37</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>11.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>51.31</td>
<td>22.54</td>
<td>4.72</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$2.75</td>
<td>37.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>11.10</td>
<td>1.81</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>4.21%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>33.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>281.12</td>
<td>9.90</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>3.76%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$2.49</td>
<td>21.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>17.07</td>
<td>6.09</td>
<td>3.28</td>
<td>12.84%</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.76</td>
<td>1.44</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>6.31%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>60.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>36.59</td>
<td>4.27</td>
<td>3.21</td>
<td>4.14%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>2.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.65</td>
<td>4.18</td>
<td>2.56</td>
<td>8.12%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>9.89</td>
<td>3.22</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>-4.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>14.05</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>15.61%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.69</td>
<td>-2.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>6.37</td>
<td>0.81</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$0.68</td>
<td>$3.02</td>
<td>-4.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>43.71</td>
<td>2.80</td>
<td>0.81</td>
<td>-0.44%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>5.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>8.78</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td>0.06</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>-9.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>72.50</td>
<td>9.88</td>
<td>0.37</td>
<td>-25.78%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>-8.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>40.48</td>
<td>5.12</td>
<td>1.62</td>
<td>5.26%</td>
<td>$7.37</td>
<td>$16.29</td>
<td>10.33%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After examining Amazon.com, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 35.44 significantly below the industry average by 0.88x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 7.26 which exceeds the industry average by 1.42x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.29, surpassing the industry average by 2.03x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.34% is 2.08% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.55 Billion, which is 5.23x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $37.37 Billion, which indicates 2.29x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 10.49%, which surpasses the industry average of 10.33%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692457_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Amazon.com against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Amazon.com has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE ratio is low compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest that the market values Amazon.com's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Exploring The Competitive Space: Amazon.com Versus Industry Peers In Broadline Retail

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) against its key competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>24.47</td>
<td>8.10</td>
<td>9.28</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$28.26</td>
<td>$39.55</td>
<td>20.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>19.53</td>
<td>5.89</td>
<td>5.58</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
<td>$36.5</td>
<td>$55.86</td>
<td>11.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>10.12</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>1.76%</td>
<td>$7.22</td>
<td>$16.11</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>11.75</td>
<td>4.48</td>
<td>6.01</td>
<td>48.33%</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>17.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>39.63</td>
<td>3.40</td>
<td>8.52</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>-4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>122.62</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>0.87%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-2.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CarGurus Inc</td>
<td>147.55</td>
<td>5.69</td>
<td>3.51</td>
<td>8.95%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>2.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>20.41</td>
<td>3.35</td>
<td>1.92</td>
<td>5.69%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>8.14</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>1.43</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>-1.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>357.75</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>27.20</td>
<td>0.92</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>8.19</td>
<td>0.65</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>1.66%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-1.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>70.26</td>
<td>2.73</td>
<td>3.16</td>
<td>7.51%</td>
<td>$4.12</td>
<td>$7.05</td>
<td>3.31%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely examining Meta Platforms, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 24.47 is lower than the industry average by 0.35x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 8.1 which exceeds the industry average by 2.97x.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 9.28, which is 2.94x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0% is 4.49% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $28.26 Billion, which is 6.86x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $39.55 Billion, which indicates 5.61x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 20.63% exceeds the industry average of 3.31%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692448_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining Meta Platforms in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. On the other hand, Meta Platforms shows high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, reflecting strong financial performance within the Interactive Media &amp; Services sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Performance Comparison: Meta Platforms And Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

An official report on April 2, 2025 reveals Representative Dwight Evans's recent sale of Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) stock, valued between $16,002 and $65,000. The transaction took place on April 2, 2025, as per the April filing.
At this time, Amazon.com shares are trading down 9.32% at $177.74.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
Over the past three years, Dwight Evans executed 20 trades totaling over $34 thousand. The largest of these trades were in Amazon.com and Raytheon Technologies stock. Some of the key transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: None
Here is a list of Dwight Evans's most recent trades:
To stay updated on Dwight Evans's trades and other congressional trades, try our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/dwight-evans">government trades tool</a> for live updates!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

Pennsylvania Rep. Dwight Evans Sold Up to $65K Worth of Amazon.com Stock

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Software industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>30.79</td>
<td>9.39</td>
<td>10.91</td>
<td>8.17%</td>
<td>$36.79</td>
<td>$47.83</td>
<td>12.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>34.24</td>
<td>24.45</td>
<td>7.47</td>
<td>19.27%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>120.47</td>
<td>17.71</td>
<td>15.64</td>
<td>4.06%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>21.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>97.84</td>
<td>17.99</td>
<td>14.32</td>
<td>4.35%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$1.66</td>
<td>14.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>43.40</td>
<td>50.49</td>
<td>12.71</td>
<td>43.82%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>17.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>26.48</td>
<td>7.74</td>
<td>4.34</td>
<td>7.48%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>4.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>430</td>
<td>13.14</td>
<td>14.38</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>32.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>30.08</td>
<td>3.12</td>
<td>6.01</td>
<td>2.72%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>13.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>43.79</td>
<td>25.43</td>
<td>7.97</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>21.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>27.75</td>
<td>9.87</td>
<td>7.93</td>
<td>9.49%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>28.80</td>
<td>2.28</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>5.26%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>6.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>46.44</td>
<td>5.88</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>28.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>19.77</td>
<td>16.56</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>19.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>-10.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>68.60</td>
<td>99.11</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>-25.97%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>5.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>78.28</td>
<td>22.6</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>7.58%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>13.07%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of Microsoft, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 30.79 significantly below the industry average by 0.39x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 9.39, which is 0.42x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 10.91, surpassing the industry average by 1.4x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.17%, which is 0.59% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.79 Billion is 56.6x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $47.83 Billion is 35.17x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 12.27% is significantly below the industry average of 13.07%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692439_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.
</li>
<li>
With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the stock is undervalued compared to peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit, Microsoft outperforms peers, indicating strong financial health. The low revenue growth may be a concern for future performance compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Inquiry Into Microsoft's Competitor Dynamics In Software Industry

A report on April 2, 2025 shows that Representative Debbie Dingell from Michigan purchase stock in Walmart (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WMT#NYSE">WMT</a>), valued between $15,001 and $50,000. According to the April filing, the transaction occurred on April 2, 2025.
At the time of writing, Walmart shares are trading down 0.57% at $89.25.
<h3>Representative's Recent Trading Activity</h3>
In the last three years, Debbie Dingell completed 22 stock transactions totaling more than $450 thousand. Meta Platforms and Service Properties Trust stocks were among the largest trades. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Walmart (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WMT#NYSE">WMT</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Walt Disney (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DIS#NYSE">DIS</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Debbie Dingell's recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Government National</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Walmart</td>
<td>WMT</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal National Mortgage</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$100,001 - $250,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-01-15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Walt Disney</td>
<td>DIS</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-01-15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
To keep an eye on Debbie Dingell's trades and other government stock activity, check out our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/debbie-dingell">real-time tracking tool</a>!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Congressional Trading Report: Rep. Debbie Dingell Bought Over $15K In Walmart Stock

A report on April 2, 2025 shows that Representative April McClain Delaney from Maryland purchase stock in Markel Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MKL#NYSE">MKL</a>), valued between $27,013 and $230,000. According to the April filing, the transaction occurred on April 2, 2025.
At the time of writing, Markel Group shares are trading down 1.75% at $1846.14.
<h3>Representative's Recent Trading Activity</h3>
Over the previous three years, April McClain Delaney conducted 55 trades, totaling more than $139 thousand. The largest of these were in A.O. Smith and Corpay stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Dayforce (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DAY#NYSE">DAY</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Markel Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MKL#NYSE">MKL</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Corpay (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CPAY#NYSE">CPAY</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of April McClain Delaney's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Westinghouse Air Brake</td>
<td>WAB</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-03-25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Toro</td>
<td>TTC</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-03-20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dayforce</td>
<td>DAY</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-03-18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BJ's Wholesale Club Hldgs</td>
<td>BJ</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BJ's Wholesale Club Hldgs</td>
<td>BJ</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-14</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
To keep an eye on April McClain Delaney's trades and other government stock activity, check out our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/april-mcclain-delaney">real-time tracking tool</a>!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CPAY

Maryland Rep. April McClain Delaney Bought Over $27K Worth of Markel Group Stock: Here's What You Should Know

In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia Corp is an upfront developer of graphics processing unit and a full-stack computing infrastructure company with data-center-scale offerings that are reshaping industry. Traditionally, GPU were used to enhanvce experience,now Nvidia offers AI GPUs, and also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. The company is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads. such as AI, model training and inference, data analytics, scientific computing, and 3D graphics, with vertical-specific optimizations to address industries ranging from healthcare and telecom to automotive and manufacturing.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>37.56</td>
<td>33.96</td>
<td>20.99</td>
<td>30.42%</td>
<td>$25.82</td>
<td>$28.72</td>
<td>77.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>25.06</td>
<td>6.86</td>
<td>10.16</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$596.09</td>
<td>$512.38</td>
<td>38.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>79.67</td>
<td>11.59</td>
<td>15.21</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
<td>$8.54</td>
<td>$10.14</td>
<td>24.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>16.62</td>
<td>6.34</td>
<td>4.27</td>
<td>11.97%</td>
<td>$4.23</td>
<td>$6.51</td>
<td>17.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>102.96</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>6.54</td>
<td>0.84%</td>
<td>$1.69</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>24.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.27</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>10.47</td>
<td>7.02%</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>-1.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.29</td>
<td>17.76</td>
<td>31.06</td>
<td>4.05%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>19.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>21.20</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.96</td>
<td>38.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>63.77</td>
<td>2.82</td>
<td>10.66</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$1.03</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-3.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>16.14</td>
<td>8.99</td>
<td>13.07</td>
<td>52.73%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>36.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>85.84</td>
<td>4.36</td>
<td>5.58</td>
<td>-0.87%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>-41.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>20.86</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.11</td>
<td>2.95%</td>
<td>$30.11</td>
<td>$26.62</td>
<td>1.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>13.20</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>1.95%</td>
<td>$0.89</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>-22.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>11.23</td>
<td>1.95</td>
<td>2.49</td>
<td>4.37%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>-14.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>11.96</td>
<td>1.49</td>
<td>2.43</td>
<td>2.28%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>-0.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>10.80</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>3.32</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>30.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>19.94</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.59</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>-11.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>1434.67</td>
<td>11.82</td>
<td>23.18</td>
<td>4.95%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>154.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>116.41</td>
<td>9.91</td>
<td>13.91</td>
<td>2.33%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-31.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>259.43</td>
<td>2.01</td>
<td>1.84</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-14.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.87</td>
<td>4.08</td>
<td>10.22</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>125.81</td>
<td>5.55</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>6.39%</td>
<td>$34.03</td>
<td>$29.61</td>
<td>12.35%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a meticulous analysis of NVIDIA, we can observe the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 37.56 significantly below the industry average by 0.3x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 33.96, which is 6.12x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 20.99, which is 2.43x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 30.42%, which is 24.03% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $25.82 Billion, which is 0.76x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $28.72 Billion, which indicates 0.97x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 77.94% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 12.35%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692429_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating NVIDIA against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
Compared to its top 4 peers, NVIDIA has a stronger financial position indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive attribute by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests NVIDIA is undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales more favorably. On the other hand, the high ROE and revenue growth, along with low EBITDA and gross profit, highlight potential for strong performance and expansion in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating NVIDIA And Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Solana's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/sol/usd">SOL</a>) price has decreased 11.75% over the past 24 hours to $112.67, continuing its downward trend over the past week of -18.0%, moving from $139.67 to its current price. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Solana over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692426_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
Solana's trading volume has climbed 131.0% over the past week along with the circulating supply of the coin, which has increased 0.4%. This brings the circulating supply to 512.62 million. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for SOL is #7 at $57.76 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692426_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$SOL

Solana Decreases More Than 11% Within 24 hours

In the current session, the stock is trading at $515.12, after a 0.57% spike. Over the past month, Northrop Grumman Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NOC#NYSE">NOC</a>) stock increased by 8.73%, and in the past year, by 13.68%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692423_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>Northrop Grumman P/E Ratio Analysis in Relation to Industry Peers</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Northrop Grumman has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 142.18 of the Aerospace &amp; Defense industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1743692423_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In summary, while the price-to-earnings ratio is a valuable tool for investors to evaluate a company's market performance, it should be used with caution. A low P/E ratio can be an indication of undervaluation, but it can also suggest weak growth prospects or financial instability. Moreover, the P/E ratio is just one of many metrics that investors should consider when making investment decisions, and it should be evaluated alongside other financial ratios, industry trends, and qualitative factors. By taking a comprehensive approach to analyzing a company's financial health, investors can make well-informed decisions that are more likely to lead to successful outcomes.

Intraday Update

A Look Into Northrop Grumman Inc's Price Over Earnings

<ul>
<li>Settlement partially resolves patent licensing dispute between the parties, with financial impacts expected to be recognized from Q2 2025</li>
<li>The parties further agree on arbitration to fully and finally resolve the remaining patent licensing dispute between the parties</li>
<li>Settlement ends all ongoing patent-related legal proceedings between the parties</li>
</ul>
STOCKHOLM, April 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ericsson (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ERIC#NASDAQ">ERIC</a>) and Lenovo have reached a settlement to resolve their patent licensing dispute over a multi-year, global patent cross-license agreement between the two companies.
As part of the settlement, all ongoing lawsuits and administrative proceedings filed by both companies in several countries, including the actions pending before the United States International Trade Commission (USITC), will be withdrawn.
Financial impacts are expected to be recognized from Q2 2025, reflecting the partial settlement. The remaining patent licensing dispute will be fully resolved through an arbitration process between the parties.

Legal

ERIC

Ericsson And Lenovo Settle Patent Licensing Dispute, Ending Ongoing Legal Proceedings And Agreeing To Arbitration For Final Resolution, With Financial Impacts Expected From Q2 2025

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PHOE#NASDAQ">PHOE</a>) IPO will take place April, 04 on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker PHOE.
The company is offering shares at an expected price between $4.00 and $6.00 per share with an insider lock-up period of 180 days ending on October 01, 2025.
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/ipos">Benzinga IPO Calendar</a>
<h3>About Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited</h3>
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited is an exempted company with limited liabilities incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">Benzinga's Most Shorted Stocks</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

IPOs

PHOE

Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited IPOs Tomorrow, Here's What You Need To Know

Benchmark analyst Christopher Kuhn reiterates Landstar System (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LSTR#NASDAQ">LSTR</a>) from Hold to Hold.

LSTR

Benchmark Reiterates Hold on Landstar Systemto Hold

Unity Software Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/U#NYSE">U</a>) disclosed the development of Survival Kids, a day-one <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/04/b44623455/unity-announces-development-of-nintendo-switch-2-launch-title-survival-kids-in-close-partnership-w" rel="noreferrer noopener">release title for the Nintendo Switch 2</a>.
This game was created in close collaboration with Konami Digital Entertainment B.V. and built entirely on Unity 6 for the Nintendo Switch 2.
Also Read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/04/44626421/trumps-reign-of-tariffs-unleashes-d-day-on-wall-street-analyst-warns-of-stagflation-risk" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump&#8217;s &#8216;Reign Of Tariffs&#8217; Unleashes &#8216;D-Day On Wall Street,&#8217; Analyst Warns Of Stagflation Risk</a>
Survival Kids marks Unity&#8217;s first full end-to-end game design and development in collaboration with a publisher partner.
This project allowed the Unity team to enhance the engine&#8217;s performance and stability.
The game utilizes various Unity capabilities, including core engine features like URP and Netcode, as well as live services such as Lobby and Relay.
The game represents a significant partnership between KONAMI and Unity, blending traditional survival gameplay with modern innovations.
Featuring new co-op mechanics and multiplayer functionality, Survival Kids stays faithful to its original concept while evolving for today&#8217;s gaming audience.
Adam Smith, VP of Unity Engine Product Management, said, &#8220;The opportunity to develop&nbsp;Survival Kids with KONAMI has been an invaluable experience, giving us insights that will help us keep improving the performance and stability of the Unity Engine for all our customers.&#8221;
&#8220;Testing of our own technology aligns with a recent shift in our development approach to ensure our tools are production-tested first so game developers can confidently create beautiful games that run smoothly.&#8221;
Yesterday, the company announced that it will officially support Nintendo Switch 2. The game will soon be available in Unity 6 as an add-on for <a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/04/b44608564/unity-to-support-developers-targeting-nintendo-switch-2-for-launch" rel="noreferrer noopener">approved Nintendo developers</a>.
Investors can gain exposure to the stock via iShares Trust iShares Future Metaverse Tech and Communications ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IVRS#NYSE">IVRS</a>) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ESPO#NASDAQ">ESPO</a>).
Price Action: U shares are down 12.8% at $18.22 at the last check Thursday.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/03/44576678/cathie-wood-defies-coreweave-ipo-slump-ark-snaps-up-3-6-million-worth-of-stock-in-nvidia-backed-company" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cathie Wood Defies CoreWeave IPO Slump, Ark Snaps Up $3.6 Million Worth Of Stock In Nvidia-Backed Company</a></li>
</ul>
Photo via Shutterstock.

Equities

Large Cap

ESPO

IVRS

Unity Teams Up With KONAMI To Launch Survival Kids On Nintendo Switch 2

RH (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RH#NYSE">RH</a>) shares are trading lower on Thursday after the company reported fourth-quarter earnings on Wednesday after <a href="https://www.benzinga.com//node/44616824">the market closed.</a>
The Details: The company reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.58, missing analysts&#8217; estimate of $1.92. In addition, RH reported sales of $812.40 million, missing analysts&#8217; estimate of $829.56.
Furthermore, the company reported that quarterly demand increased 17%, while RH brand demand rose 21%.
In its letter to shareholders the company said, &#8220;The positive inflection of our business continued to accelerate in the fourth quarter with revenue up 18%, and adjusted operating income increasing 57%, in each case on a comparable 13-week basis, outperforming other home furnishing businesses by a wide margin, as the most prolific product transformation and platform expansion in the history of our industry continues to unfold.&#8221;
The company expects revenue growth of 12.5% to 13.5% for the first quarter and 10% to 13% for the 2025 fiscal year.
Analyst Changes: Following the earnings report, multiple analysts cut <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/44627705/these-analysts-slash-their-forecasts-on-rh-following-downbeat-results">their price targets.</a>
<ul>
<li>Guggenheim analyst Steven Forbes maintained a Buy rating on RH and lowered the price target from&nbsp;$500&nbsp;to&nbsp;$300.</li>
<li>Wells Fargo analyst Zachary Fadem maintained an Overweight rating on RH and lowered the price target from&nbsp;$375&nbsp;to&nbsp;$300.</li>
<li>UBS analyst Michael Lasser maintained a Neutral rating on RH and lowered the price target from&nbsp;$250&nbsp;to&nbsp;$235.</li>
</ul>
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/insights/options/25/04/44628736/smart-money-is-betting-big-in-pypl-options">Smart Money Is Betting Big In PYPL Options</a>
RH Price Action: At the time of writing, RH shares are trading 43.2% lower at $141.37, according to data from <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro.</a>
Image: via Shutterstock

What's Going On With RH Shares Thursday?

Press Releases

Structure Therapeutics Announces Participation in Upcoming Investor Conferences

Health Care

Management

Structure Therapeutics Appoints Angus C. Russell to Board of Directors

Structure Therapeutics Strengthens Executive Team with Promotion of Blai Coll, M.D., Ph.D. to Chief Medical Officer and Appointment of Ashley Hall, J.D. as Chief Development Officer

Structure Therapeutics Announces Multiple Upcoming Presentations at ObesityWeek® 2024

Structure Therapeutics Announces First Patients Dosed in Phase 2b ACCESS Clinical Study Evaluating Oral Small Molecule GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, GSBR-1290, for Obesity

Comments

Structure Therapeutics

Interés en corto

Structure Therapeutics (NASDAQ:GPCR) Bolsa, Informe de interés en corto

La gente también mira

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL