La cadena de opciones muestra datos clave de las opciones de acciones de Tungray Technologies a varios precios de ejercicio y fechas de vencimiento. Los operadores utilizan esta información para analizar posibles operaciones y evaluar el sentimiento del mercado para Tungray Technologies..

Tungray Technologies (NASDAQ:TRSG) Bolsa, Cadena de Opciones

Tungray Technologies

Tungray Technologies Inc is an engineer-to-order company that provides custom industrial manufacturing solutions to original equipment manufacturers in the semiconductor, printer, electronics, and home appliance industries. It predominantly generates revenue through the manufacture of custom industrial manufacturing solutions, direct drive and linear DC motors, and induction welding equipment. Geographically, the company generates a majority of its revenue from Singapore and the rest from China.

Tungray Technologies Inc - Class A Ordinary Shares

Tungray Technologies Inc

Scotiabank analyst Allan Verkhovski maintains Autodesk (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ADSK#NASDAQ">ADSK</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from $360 to $315.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

ADSK

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Autodesk, Lowers Price Target to $315

HC Wainwright &amp; Co. analyst Andrew Fein reiterates Dyne Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DYN#NASDAQ">DYN</a>) with a Buy and maintains $46 price target.

Reiteration

HC Wainwright & Co. Reiterates Buy on Dyne Therapeutics, Maintains $46 Price Target

Scotiabank analyst Jonathan Goldman maintains Adentra (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ADEN#TSX">ADEN</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from C$49 to C$43.

TSX:ADEN

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Adentra, Lowers Price Target to C$43

Deep-pocketed investors have adopted a bullish approach towards Intel (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTC#NASDAQ">INTC</a>), and it's something market players shouldn't ignore. Our tracking of public options records at Benzinga unveiled this significant move today. The identity of these investors remains unknown, but such a substantial move in INTC usually suggests something big is about to happen.
We gleaned this information from our observations today when Benzinga's options scanner highlighted 28 extraordinary options activities for Intel. This level of activity is out of the ordinary.
The general mood among these heavyweight investors is divided, with 50% leaning bullish and 42% bearish. Among these notable options, 5 are puts, totaling $558,558, and 23 are calls, amounting to $879,970.
<h3>What's The Price Target?</h3>
Taking into account the Volume and Open Interest on these contracts, it appears that whales have been targeting a price range from $11.0 to $40.0 for Intel over the last 3 months. 
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Trends</h3>
Assessing the volume and open interest is a strategic step in options trading. These metrics shed light on the liquidity and investor interest in Intel's options at specified strike prices. The forthcoming data visualizes the fluctuation in volume and open interest for both calls and puts, linked to Intel's substantial trades, within a strike price spectrum from $11.0 to $40.0 over the preceding 30 days.
<h3>Intel Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223769_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Biggest Options Spotted:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>INTC</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>10/17/25</td>
<td>$10.25</td>
<td>$10.15</td>
<td>$10.15</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
<td>$274.0K</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>570</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTC</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$1.3</td>
<td>$1.27</td>
<td>$1.27</td>
<td>$26.50</td>
<td>$176.4K</td>
<td>219</td>
<td>718</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTC</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$5.1</td>
<td>$4.95</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$99.3K</td>
<td>2.5K</td>
<td>209</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTC</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>03/28/25</td>
<td>$1.28</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>$1.28</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$64.0K</td>
<td>84.7K</td>
<td>671</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INTC</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$50.6K</td>
<td>42.8K</td>
<td>11.9K</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Intel</h3>
Intel is a leading digital chipmaker, focused on the design and manufacturing of microprocessors for the global personal computer and data center markets. Intel pioneered the x86 architecture for microprocessors and was the prime proponent of Moore's law for advances in semiconductor manufacturing. Intel remains the market share leader in central processing units in both the PC and server end markets. Intel has also been expanding into new adjacencies, such as communications infrastructure, automotive, and the Internet of Things. Further, Intel expects to leverage its chip manufacturing capabilities into an outsourced foundry model where it constructs chips for others.
Having examined the options trading patterns of Intel, our attention now turns directly to the company. This shift allows us to delve into its present market position and performance
<h3>Present Market Standing of Intel</h3>
<ul>
<li>With a volume of 64,006,015, the price of INTC is up 7.23% at $25.79. </li>
<li>RSI indicators hint that the underlying stock may be approaching overbought.</li>
<li>Next earnings are expected to be released in 38 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Expert Opinions on Intel</h3>
Over the past month, 2 industry analysts have shared their insights on this stock, proposing an average target price of $27.0.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Cantor Fitzgerald continues to hold a Neutral rating for Intel, targeting a price of $29. 
&#x2A; An analyst from B of A Securities upgraded its action to Neutral with a price target of $25. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Intel, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Options

Markets

INTC

Decoding Intel's Options Activity: What's the Big Picture?

Investors with a lot of money to spend have taken a bullish stance on United Airlines Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UAL#NASDAQ">UAL</a>).
And retail traders should know.
We noticed this today when the trades showed up on publicly available options history that we track here at Benzinga.
Whether these are institutions or just wealthy individuals, we don't know. But when something this big happens with UAL, it often means somebody knows something is about to happen.
So how do we know what these investors just did? 
Today, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga</a>'s options scanner spotted 11 uncommon options trades for United Airlines Holdings.
This isn't normal.
The overall sentiment of these big-money traders is split between 45% bullish and 27%, bearish.
Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 9 are puts, for a total amount of $1,339,920, and 2 are calls, for a total amount of $63,950.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
After evaluating the trading volumes and Open Interest, it's evident that the major market movers are focusing on a price band between $42.0 and $85.0 for United Airlines Holdings, spanning the last three months.
<h3>Volume &amp; Open Interest Development</h3>
In today's trading context, the average open interest for options of United Airlines Holdings stands at 1002.8, with a total volume reaching 3,097.00. The accompanying chart delineates the progression of both call and put option volume and open interest for high-value trades in United Airlines Holdings, situated within the strike price corridor from $42.0 to $85.0, throughout the last 30 days.
<h3>United Airlines Holdings Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223764_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th align="right">Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>UAL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$17.75</td>
<td>$16.9</td>
<td>$17.35</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$173.5K</td>
<td align="right">606</td>
<td align="right">200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UAL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$17.6</td>
<td>$17.2</td>
<td>$17.2</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$172.0K</td>
<td align="right">606</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UAL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$17.15</td>
<td>$16.75</td>
<td>$17.15</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$171.3K</td>
<td align="right">606</td>
<td align="right">500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UAL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$17.25</td>
<td>$17.1</td>
<td>$17.1</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$171.0K</td>
<td align="right">606</td>
<td align="right">300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UAL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$17.2</td>
<td>$16.9</td>
<td>$16.98</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$169.8K</td>
<td align="right">606</td>
<td align="right">700</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About United Airlines Holdings</h3>
United Airlines is a major us network carrier with hubs in San Francisco, Chicago, Houston, Denver, Los Angeles, New York/Newark, and Washington, D.C. United operates a hub-and-spoke system that is more focused on international and long-haul travel than its large us peers.
<h3>Current Position of United Airlines Holdings</h3>
<ul>
<li>With a volume of 1,484,803, the price of UAL is up 0.21% at $73.82. </li>
<li>RSI indicators hint that the underlying stock may be oversold.</li>
<li>Next earnings are expected to be released in 29 days.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Expert Opinions on United Airlines Holdings</h3>
A total of 2 professional analysts have given their take on this stock in the last 30 days, setting an average price target of $125.0.
Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days?
20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/options-moneyline-2/?t=Moop1arja3be22op14&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from B of A Securities persists with their Buy rating on United Airlines Holdings, maintaining a target price of $110. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Barclays keeps a Overweight rating on United Airlines Holdings with a target price of $140. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for United Airlines Holdings, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Check Out What Whales Are Doing With UAL

Investors with a lot of money to spend have taken a bearish stance on Accenture (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ACN#NYSE">ACN</a>).
And retail traders should know.
We noticed this today when the trades showed up on publicly available options history that we track here at Benzinga.
Whether these are institutions or just wealthy individuals, we don't know. But when something this big happens with ACN, it often means somebody knows something is about to happen.
So how do we know what these investors just did? 
Today, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga</a>'s options scanner spotted 8 uncommon options trades for Accenture.
This isn't normal.
The overall sentiment of these big-money traders is split between 37% bullish and 50%, bearish.
Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 3 are puts, for a total amount of $150,380, and 5 are calls, for a total amount of $352,418.
<h3>Projected Price Targets</h3>
Taking into account the Volume and Open Interest on these contracts, it appears that whales have been targeting a price range from $300.0 to $400.0 for Accenture over the last 3 months. 
<h3>Insights into Volume &amp; Open Interest</h3>
Looking at the volume and open interest is an insightful way to conduct due diligence on a stock.
This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Accenture's options for a given strike price.
Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Accenture's whale activity within a strike price range from $300.0 to $400.0 in the last 30 days. 
<h3>Accenture 30-Day Option Volume &amp; Interest Snapshot</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223759_0.png" alt="Options Call Chart" />
<h3>Significant Options Trades Detected:</h3>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Ask</th>
<th>Bid</th>
<th>Price</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th align="right">Open Interest</th>
<th align="right">Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ACN</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$27.0</td>
<td>$26.5</td>
<td>$26.5</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$161.6K</td>
<td align="right">48</td>
<td align="right">61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACN</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/21/25</td>
<td>$28.2</td>
<td>$24.9</td>
<td>$26.48</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$98.0K</td>
<td align="right">48</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACN</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$78.2</td>
<td>$75.0</td>
<td>$76.2</td>
<td>$400.00</td>
<td>$68.5K</td>
<td align="right">114</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACN</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$40.9</td>
<td>$40.0</td>
<td>$40.9</td>
<td>$340.00</td>
<td>$40.9K</td>
<td align="right">97</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACN</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$40.9</td>
<td>$39.9</td>
<td>$40.9</td>
<td>$340.00</td>
<td>$40.9K</td>
<td align="right">97</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h3>About Accenture</h3>
Accenture is a leading global IT services firm that provides consulting, strategy, and technology and operational services. These services run the gamut from aiding enterprises with digital transformation to procurement services to software system integration. The company provides its IT offerings to a variety of sectors, including communications, media and technology, financial services, health and public services, consumer products, and resources. Accenture employs just under 500,000 people throughout 200 cities in 51 countries.
After a thorough review of the options trading surrounding Accenture, we move to examine the company in more detail. This includes an assessment of its current market status and performance.
<h3>Present Market Standing of Accenture</h3>
<ul>
<li>With a trading volume of 878,051, the price of ACN is up by 1.76%, reaching $324.43.</li>
<li>Current RSI values indicate that the stock is may be oversold.</li>
<li>Next earnings report is scheduled for 3 days from now.</li>
</ul>
<h3>What Analysts Are Saying About Accenture</h3>
In the last month, 4 experts released ratings on this stock with an average target price of $384.5.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Benzinga Edge's Unusual Options board spots potential market movers before they happen. See what positions big money is taking on your favorite stocks. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22bz20&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=options-activity&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>. 
&#x2A; An analyst from Piper Sandler has decided to maintain their Overweight rating on Accenture, which currently sits at a price target of $396. 
&#x2A; Consistent in their evaluation, an analyst from Stifel keeps a Buy rating on Accenture with a target price of $380. 
&#x2A; In a positive move, an analyst from Baird has upgraded their rating to Outperform and adjusted the price target to $390. 
&#x2A; Maintaining their stance, an analyst from Morgan Stanley continues to hold a Equal-Weight rating for Accenture, targeting a price of $372. 
Options are a riskier asset compared to just trading the stock, but they have higher profit potential. Serious options traders manage this risk by educating themselves daily, scaling in and out of trades, following more than one indicator, and following the markets closely.
If you want to stay updated on the latest options trades for Accenture, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a> gives you real-time options trades alerts.

Behind the Scenes of Accenture's Latest Options Trends

<a href="https://x.com/CitronResearch/status/1901649333084140025">https://x.com/CitronResearch/status/1901649333084140025</a>
&nbsp;

Short Sellers

Trading Ideas

GRRR

Citron Research Posts On X "@SEC_Enforcement should halt trading in Gorilla Technologies. Citron doesn't invoke Rule 10b-5 lightly—Prohibits false or misleading statements or omissions of material facts that mislead investors ..."

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) against its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>33.89</td>
<td>48.04</td>
<td>8.25</td>
<td>58.74%</td>
<td>$45.91</td>
<td>$58.27</td>
<td>3.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>18.33</td>
<td>4.01</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>54.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>7.51</td>
<td>0.81</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$2.29</td>
<td>16.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>17.04</td>
<td>19.08</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>31.69%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>2.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>164.26</td>
<td>12.72</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>3.12%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>5.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>12.87</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>41.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>9.96</td>
<td>0.57</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>43.68</td>
<td>2.67</td>
<td>0.81</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>21.25</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>36.86</td>
<td>5.25</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>6.54%</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>23.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of Apple, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 33.89 is 0.92x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 48.04 relative to the industry average by 9.15x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 8.25, which is 4.94x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 58.74%, which is 52.2% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.91 Billion, which is 117.72x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $58.27 Billion is 73.76x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 3.95%, which is much lower than the industry average of 23.1%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223646_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Apple in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Apple is positioned in the middle among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a relatively balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also utilizing equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Analyzing Apple In Comparison To Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) against its key competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>35.80</td>
<td>7.34</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>7.34%</td>
<td>$38.55</td>
<td>$37.37</td>
<td>10.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>20.49</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>2.54</td>
<td>5.01%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>7.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>12.06</td>
<td>4.42</td>
<td>3.51</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>53.63</td>
<td>23.55</td>
<td>4.93</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$2.75</td>
<td>37.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>11.63</td>
<td>1.89</td>
<td>0.41</td>
<td>4.21%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>33.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>281.38</td>
<td>9.91</td>
<td>1.36</td>
<td>3.76%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$2.49</td>
<td>21.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>16.53</td>
<td>5.90</td>
<td>3.18</td>
<td>12.84%</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>8.48</td>
<td>1.57</td>
<td>0.61</td>
<td>6.31%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>60.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>20.80</td>
<td>4.91</td>
<td>3.39</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>30.50</td>
<td>3.88</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>9.70</td>
<td>3.16</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>11.41%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>41.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>13.90</td>
<td>3.51</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>15.51%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>24.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>6.32</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>63.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>38.94</td>
<td>2.49</td>
<td>0.72</td>
<td>-0.44%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>5.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>8.22</td>
<td>0.24</td>
<td>0.06</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>45.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>34.80</td>
<td>9.14</td>
<td>0.43</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>37.83</td>
<td>5.19</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>7.24%</td>
<td>$7.32</td>
<td>$16.16</td>
<td>27.94%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When closely examining Amazon.com, the following trends emerge: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 35.8 is 0.95x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 7.34, which is 1.41x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.33, surpassing the industry average by 1.98x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.34% that is 0.1% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.55 Billion, which is 5.27x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $37.37 Billion is 2.31x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 10.49%, which is much lower than the industry average of 27.94%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223637_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating Amazon.com alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Amazon.com has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE ratio is low compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest that the market values Amazon.com's assets and sales highly. Amazon.com's high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit reflect strong profitability and operational efficiency. However, the low revenue growth rate may raise concerns about future performance compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Evaluating Amazon.com Against Peers In Broadline Retail Industry

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>25.47</td>
<td>8.43</td>
<td>9.66</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$28.26</td>
<td>$39.55</td>
<td>20.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>20.58</td>
<td>6.21</td>
<td>5.88</td>
<td>8.3%</td>
<td>$36.5</td>
<td>$55.86</td>
<td>11.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>10.30</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>1.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>11.97</td>
<td>4.56</td>
<td>6.12</td>
<td>48.33%</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>17.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>41.11</td>
<td>4.14</td>
<td>8.84</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>-4.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>130.56</td>
<td>2.11</td>
<td>3.12</td>
<td>0.87%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-2.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CarGurus Inc</td>
<td>153.85</td>
<td>5.93</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>8.95%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>2.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>9.10</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>1.60</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>-1.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>14.72</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>1.35</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>18.64</td>
<td>3.06</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>5.69%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>346</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.09</td>
<td>0.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>28.36</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>9.18</td>
<td>0.73</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>1.66%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-1.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>66.2</td>
<td>2.66</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>7.0%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$6.56</td>
<td>3.25%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of Meta Platforms, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 25.47 is lower than the industry average by 0.38x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 8.43 relative to the industry average by 3.17x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 9.66, which is 3.11x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0% that is 5.0% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $28.26 Billion, which is 7.15x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $39.55 Billion, which indicates 6.03x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 20.63% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 3.25%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223629_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating Meta Platforms against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insights Into Meta Platforms's Performance Versus Peers In Interactive Media &amp; Services Sector

Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>31.31</td>
<td>9.54</td>
<td>11.09</td>
<td>8.17%</td>
<td>$36.79</td>
<td>$47.83</td>
<td>12.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>35.04</td>
<td>25.02</td>
<td>7.64</td>
<td>19.27%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>123.44</td>
<td>18.14</td>
<td>16.02</td>
<td>4.06%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>21.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>103.02</td>
<td>18.94</td>
<td>15.08</td>
<td>4.35%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$1.66</td>
<td>14.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>42.59</td>
<td>49.55</td>
<td>12.47</td>
<td>43.82%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>17.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>26.50</td>
<td>7.74</td>
<td>4.34</td>
<td>7.48%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>4.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>412.69</td>
<td>12.38</td>
<td>13.80</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>6.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>30.34</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>6.06</td>
<td>2.72%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>13.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>41.89</td>
<td>24.33</td>
<td>7.63</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>21.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>27.18</td>
<td>9.66</td>
<td>7.77</td>
<td>9.49%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>28.66</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>4.02</td>
<td>5.26%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>6.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>3.26</td>
<td>0.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>21.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>19.56</td>
<td>16.14</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>19.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>-10.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>69.97</td>
<td>101.09</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>-25.97%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>5.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>76.67</td>
<td>22.6</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>7.41%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
At 31.31, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.41x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 9.54, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.42x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.09, which is 1.42x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.17% that is 0.76% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.79 Billion is 56.6x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $47.83 Billion, which indicates 35.17x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 12.27% exceeds the industry average of 10.53%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223621_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating Microsoft against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft is in a relatively stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft, the PE and PB ratios are low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. However, the high PS ratio suggests overvaluation based on revenue. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth outperform industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential in the software sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Exploring The Competitive Space: Microsoft Versus Industry Peers In Software

RBC Capital analyst Drew McReynolds reiterates Illumin Holdings (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ILLM#TSX">ILLM</a>) with a Outperform and maintains C$3 price target.

TSX:ILLM

RBC Capital Reiterates Outperform on Illumin Holdings, Maintains C$3 Price Target

Chevron (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVX#NYSE">CVX</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 1.84% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 21.68%. Currently, Chevron has a market capitalization of $275.36 billion. 
Buying $100 In CVX: If an investor had bought $100 of CVX stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $276.01 today based on a price of $156.40 for CVX at the time of writing.
<h3>Chevron's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223616_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$100 Invested In Chevron 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

A report on March 14, 2025 shows that Representative Thomas Kean from New Jersey sale stock in Stryker (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SYK#NYSE">SYK</a>), valued between $17,003 and $80,000. According to the March filing, the transaction occurred on March 14, 2025.
At the time of writing, Stryker shares are trading up 0.93% at $372.98.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
In the last three years, Thomas Kean completed 76 stock transactions totaling more than $342 thousand. Aon and Johnson &amp; Johnson stocks were among the largest trades. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Stryker (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SYK#NYSE">SYK</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Magnera (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MAGN#NYSE">MAGN</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Thomas Kean's recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com</td>
<td>AMZN</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-02-26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stryker</td>
<td>SYK</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-02-26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Magnera</td>
<td>MAGN</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-02-12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mondelez International</td>
<td>MDLZ</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-02-07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pernod Ricard</td>
<td>PRNDY</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-02-07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Stay informed on Thomas Kean's trades and other members of Congress with our real-time <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/thomas-kean">government trades tracking tool</a>!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

MAGN

New Jersey Rep. Thomas Kean Sold Over $17K Worth of Stryker Stock: Here's What You Should Know

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) and its primary competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia Corp is an upfront developer of graphics processing unit and a full-stack computing infrastructure company with data-center-scale offerings that are reshaping industry. Traditionally, GPU were used to enhanvce experience,now Nvidia offers AI GPUs, and also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. The company is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads. such as AI, model training and inference, data analytics, scientific computing, and 3D graphics, with vertical-specific optimizations to address industries ranging from healthcare and telecom to automotive and manufacturing.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>41.38</td>
<td>37.42</td>
<td>23.13</td>
<td>30.42%</td>
<td>$25.82</td>
<td>$28.72</td>
<td>77.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>90.53</td>
<td>13.17</td>
<td>17.29</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
<td>$8.54</td>
<td>$10.14</td>
<td>24.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>25.34</td>
<td>6.93</td>
<td>10.27</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$596.09</td>
<td>$512.38</td>
<td>38.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>16.89</td>
<td>6.44</td>
<td>4.34</td>
<td>11.97%</td>
<td>$4.23</td>
<td>$6.51</td>
<td>17.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>100.97</td>
<td>2.84</td>
<td>6.41</td>
<td>0.84%</td>
<td>$1.69</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>24.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>33.93</td>
<td>9.50</td>
<td>10.37</td>
<td>7.02%</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>-1.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>155.18</td>
<td>19.37</td>
<td>33.87</td>
<td>4.05%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>19.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>28.88</td>
<td>2.40</td>
<td>3.89</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>66.69</td>
<td>2.95</td>
<td>11.15</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$1.03</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-3.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>16.56</td>
<td>9.22</td>
<td>13.41</td>
<td>52.73%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>36.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>93.86</td>
<td>4.77</td>
<td>6.11</td>
<td>-0.87%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>-41.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>14.98</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>1.95%</td>
<td>$0.89</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>-22.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>2.14</td>
<td>1.17</td>
<td>2.94%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>11.90</td>
<td>2.07</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>4.37%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>-14.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>1.53</td>
<td>2.44</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>11.02</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>3.39</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>30.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>21.35</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.77</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>-11.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>138.16</td>
<td>11.79</td>
<td>16.51</td>
<td>2.33%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-31.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>1639</td>
<td>13.50</td>
<td>26.48</td>
<td>4.95%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>154.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>32.31</td>
<td>4.41</td>
<td>11.05</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>254.96</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>1.81</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-14.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>139.27</td>
<td>5.99</td>
<td>9.36</td>
<td>6.51%</td>
<td>$33.97</td>
<td>$29.62</td>
<td>14.97%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of NVIDIA, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 41.38, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.3x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 37.42 which exceeds the industry average by 6.25x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 23.13, which is 2.47x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 30.42% that is 23.91% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $25.82 Billion is 0.76x below the industry average, suggesting potential lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower gross profit of $28.72 Billion, which indicates 0.97x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 77.94% exceeds the industry average of 14.97%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223613_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing NVIDIA in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests that NVIDIA may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the stock may be overvalued based on its book value and sales. On the other hand, the high ROE, low EBITDA, low gross profit, and high revenue growth suggest that NVIDIA is performing well in terms of profitability and growth compared to its industry counterparts.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Comparative Study: NVIDIA And Industry Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Over the past 24 hours, BNB's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/bnb/usd">BNB</a>) price has risen 4.77% to $630.74. This continues its positive trend over the past week where it has experienced a 15.0% gain, moving from $545.51 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $788.84. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for BNB over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223610_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has climbed 47.0% over the past week, moving opposite, directionally, with the overall circulating supply of the coin, which has decreased 0.02%. This brings the circulating supply to 145.89 million, which makes up an estimated 72.94% of its max supply of 200.00 million. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for BNB is #5 at $92.07 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1742223611_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$BNB

BNB Up More Than 4% In 24 hours

March 14, 2025 records indicate that Representative Susie Lee filed a sale of Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FLL#NASDAQ">FLL</a>), valued between $60,004 and $200,000. According to the March filing, the transaction occurred on March 14, 2025.
Currently, Full House Resorts shares are trading down 0.37% at $4.01.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
Over the previous three years, Susie Lee conducted 84 trades, totaling more than $224 thousand. The largest of these were in Booz Allen Hamilton and Churchill Downs stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FLL#NASDAQ">FLL</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FLL#NASDAQ">FLL</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FLL#NASDAQ">FLL</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Susie Lee's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Full House Resorts</td>
<td>FLL</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-03-12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Full House Resorts</td>
<td>FLL</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-02-24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Full House Resorts</td>
<td>FLL</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-02-21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Full House Resorts</td>
<td>FLL</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S (Partial)</td>
<td>2025-02-13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
To stay updated on Susie Lee's trades and other congressional trades, try our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/susie-lee">government trades tool</a> for live updates!
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Nevada Rep. Susie Lee Sold Over $60K Worth of Full House Resorts Stock: Here's What You Should Know

RBC Capital analyst Darko Mihelic maintains Sagicor Financial Co (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SFC#TSX">SFC</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from C$8.5 to C$9.

TSX:SFC

RBC Capital Maintains Outperform on Sagicor Financial Co, Raises Price Target to C$9

RBC Capital analyst Michael Harvey reiterates Headwater Exploration (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HWX#TSX">HWX</a>) with a Sector Perform and maintains C$9 price target.

TSX:HWX

RBC Capital Reiterates Sector Perform on Headwater Exploration, Maintains C$9 Price Target

DA Davidson analyst Gary Tenner maintains Veritex Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VBTX#NASDAQ">VBTX</a>) with a Buy and maintains $34 price target.

VBTX

DA Davidson Maintains Buy on Veritex Holdings, Maintains $34 Price Target

Press Releases

TRSG Investor News: Rosen Law Firm Encourages Tungray Technologies Inc Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - TRSG

Legal

TRSG Investor News: If You Have Suffered Losses in Tungray Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: TRSG), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights

TRSG Announcement: If You Have Suffered Losses in Tungray Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: TRSG), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights

Comments

Tungray Technologies

Tungray Technologies (TRSG) Opciones

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL