Últimas noticias sobre Nature Wood Gr (NASDAQ:NWGL) Bolsa

Nature Wood Gr

Nature Wood Group Ltd is a vertically-integrated forestry company that focuses on FSC business operations. It produces various products, including logs, decking, flooring, sawn timber, recycled charcoal, synthesized charcoal, machine-made charcoal, and essential oils. The Group owns natural forest concessions and cutting rights for exploiting timbers on parcels of land in Peru. The Group is organized into two operating divisions; Direct Purchase and Original Design Manufacturer (ODM) Services, and Manufacturing segments. The Direct Purchase and ODM Segment that derives the majority of revenue engages in the business of sourcing live wood and owning designed designs on wood products for sales to end customers. Geographically, the company generates a majority of its revenue from China.

Nature Wood Group Limited - American Depositary Shares

Nature Wood Group Ltd

Imagine buying a TV online and paying $500, only to find out someone else paid $400 for the exact same one, and another person got it for $350. No discounts. No loyalty cards. Just different prices for different people.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Hidden Cost Of Personalized Pricing</h2>
&#8220;You&#8217;d be outraged,&#8221; said former Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan in a new <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cbtUYshYM8">video</a> posted by economist and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich. &#8220;You would demand to know why you were being charged more than someone else for the exact same TV, on the exact same day.&#8221;
Don't Miss:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl-scaling-fast-from-spacex-orders-to-600-homes-built-this-60k-foldable-home-may-be-the-future-of-housing">this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share.</a></li>
<li>Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart &amp; Target – Many are rushing to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.30/share!</a></li>
</ul>
As Reich said, it&#8217;s a &#8220;shady new way to charge you more for something than anyone else is paying,&#8221; and according to Khan, that scenario isn't hypothetical. It&#8217;s already happening, quietly and behind the scenes. The tactic is called surveillance pricing, and it uses your personal data to determine how much you&#8217;re charged. &#8220;Businesses may be using this trove of personal information to charge each of us a different price for the exact same product or service,&#8221; she explained.
Our phones and computers <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/government/24/09/40946073/no-privacy-for-profits-sake-ftc-calls-out-amazon-meta-big-tech-for-exposing-users-to-host-of-harms">collect huge amounts of data</a> on us every day. Companies tap into that data—like your location, income level, browsing habits, even your mouse movements—to figure out your &#8220;pain point,&#8221; or the highest price you&#8217;re likely to pay.
&#8220;And unlike being in a physical store where you generally see the same price tag as everyone else,&#8221; Khan said, &#8220;online shopping is an individualized experience.&#8221;
The goal? Maximize profit by charging each person as much as possible, without them even realizing it.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/wideradvisor-retirement-planning">Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation</a>.&nbsp;
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Real-World Examples Are Already Out There</h2>
This isn&#8217;t just theory. It's already happening across industries. Here are some examples Khan mentioned in the video:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The Princeton Review charged higher prices for test prep to customers in ZIP codes with higher Asian populations.</li>
<li>Rideshare apps charged more to users with low phone battery life.</li>
<li>People booking hotel rooms from wealthier cities like San Francisco were shown prices up to $500 higher per night.</li>
<li>Some internet providers charged the same fees for slower speeds in poorer, less white neighborhoods.</li>
</ul>
&#8220;These surveillance practices are opaque, so we don&#8217;t know the full extent of how our personal information is being used against us,&#8221; Khan said.
This goes further than mere inconvenience: it results in higher charges precisely when people are at their most vulnerable. For example, if you're a new parent searching for medicine, you could get hit with higher prices. If someone dies and you need a last-minute flight, your <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/24/09/41019443/ftc-chair-lina-khan-warns-airlines-may-exploit-ai-for-price-discrimination-raising-concerns-over">costs could jump</a> just because of an email about funeral arrangements, Khan explained.
See Also: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/tax-deferring-adv"> Tax deferring is their number one strategy</a>.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Can Be Done About It?</h2>
Even though she&#8217;s not at the head of the FTC anymore, Khan says the agency should keep investigating. &#8220;Americans deserve to know how their private data is being used,&#8221; Khan said. And stronger laws are needed to protect people from this kind of <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43063862/whats-going-on-with-pepsico-stock-today">price discrimination</a>.
Some states are already proposing laws to ban surveillance pricing outright.
In the meantime, there are a few steps individuals can take. For instance, regularly clear your cookies and browsing history, and use a virtual private network or private browser to limit data collection.
&#8220;Businesses shouldn&#8217;t be able to weaponize our own data against us,&#8221; Khan concluded in the video. &#8220;Charging each of us a different price just because they can.&#8221;
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/gbr-savings-by-age">If You're Age 35, 50, or 60: Here&#8217;s How Much You Should Have Saved Vs. Invested By Now</a></li>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-peter-thiel-turned-his-roth-ira-into-5-billion-and-why-accredited-investors-are-now-eyeing-this-smartphone-disruptor">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.30/share!</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

News

Corporations Have A 'Shady New Way To Charge You More.' It's Called Surveillance Pricing, And It's Weaponizing Your Own Data Against You

Randall K Fields, Chief Executive Officer at ReposiTrak (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TRAK#NYSE">TRAK</a>), reported an insider sell on June 18, according to a new SEC filing. 
What Happened: Fields opted to sell 7,500 shares of ReposiTrak, according to a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000050471/000141588925017684//Archives/edgar/data/50471/000141588925017684/0001415889-25-017684-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday. The transaction's total worth stands at $152,310.
The latest update on Thursday morning shows ReposiTrak shares up by 1.55%, trading at $20.27.
<h3>Discovering ReposiTrak: A Closer Look</h3>
ReposiTrak Inc is a software as a service provider with extensive capabilities that gives their customers an easy, cost-efficient way to expand their services to their benefit. The company and its subsidiaries develop, market, and support proprietary software products. These products assist the management of business operations, which helps clients to make more informed decisions. The company also provides a cloud-based solution to remain in compliance with business records and regulatory requirements. The firm's services comprise implementation, business optimization, outsourcing, technical services, education, and application hosting.
<h3>ReposiTrak: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Revenue Growth: Over the 3 months period, ReposiTrak showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 16.3% as of 31 March, 2025. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Insights into Profitability:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company sets a benchmark with a high gross margin of 84.58%, reflecting superior cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): ReposiTrak's EPS reflects a decline, falling below the industry average with a current EPS of 0.1.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: ReposiTrak's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.02, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
Analyzing Market Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The P/E ratio of 58.71 is lower than the industry average, implying a discounted valuation for ReposiTrak's stock.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 17.32 as compared to the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): ReposiTrak's EV/EBITDA ratio of 39.14 exceeds industry averages, indicating a premium valuation in the market
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Positioned below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization faces constraints in size. This could be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Relevance of Insider Transactions</h3>
While insider transactions provide valuable information, they should be part of a broader analysis in making investment decisions.
When discussing legal matters, the term "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, as stipulated in Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and significant hedge funds. Such insiders are required to report their transactions through a Form 4 filing, which must be completed within two business days of the transaction.
A new purchase by a company insider is a indication that they anticipate the stock will rise.
On the other hand, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Exploring Key Transaction Codes</h3>
Taking a closer look at transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> often prioritize those unfolding in the open market, meticulously cataloged in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C denotes the conversion of an option, and transaction code A signifies a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0000050471">Check Out The Full List Of ReposiTrak's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

Trading Ideas

TRAK

Chief Executive Officer Of ReposiTrak Sold $152K In Stock

It was reported on June 18, that BU LIP TAN, Board Member at Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRDO#NASDAQ">CRDO</a>) executed a significant insider sell, according to an SEC filing.
What Happened: TAN's recent move involves selling 171,473 shares of Credo Technology Group. This information is documented in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001807794/000162828025032152//Archives/edgar/data/1807794/000162828025032152/0001628280-25-032152-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday. The total value is $13,358,179.
During Thursday's morning session, Credo Technology Group shares up by 6.64%, currently priced at $85.0.
<h3>Unveiling the Story Behind Credo Technology Group</h3>
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd delivers high-speed solutions to break bandwidth barriers on every wired connection in the data infrastructure market. It provides secure, high-speed connectivity solutions that deliver improved power and cost efficiency as data rates and corresponding bandwidth requirements increase exponentially throughout the data infrastructure market. It has a geographic presence in Hong Kong, the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan, and the Rest of the World.
<h3>Credo Technology Group: Delving into Financials</h3>
Revenue Growth: Credo Technology Group's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 30 April, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 25.94%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Key Insights into Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 67.16%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): With an EPS below industry norms, Credo Technology Group exhibits below-average bottom-line performance with a current EPS of 0.21.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Credo Technology Group's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.02.
Evaluating Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The current Price to Earnings ratio of 274.86 is higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 33.06 is above industry norms, reflecting an elevated valuation for Credo Technology Group's stock and potential overvaluation based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Credo Technology Group's EV/EBITDA ratio stands at 345.19, surpassing industry benchmarks. This places the company in a position with a higher-than-average market valuation.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Falling below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a reduced size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Why Insider Transactions Are Important</h3>
It's important to note that insider transactions alone should not dictate investment decisions, but they can provide valuable insights.
Exploring the legal landscape, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, as stipulated by Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This encompasses executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are required to report their transactions through a Form 4 filing, which must be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Highlighted by a company insider's new purchase, there's a positive anticipation for the stock to rise.
But, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>A Closer Look at Important Transaction Codes</h3>
Examining transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> often concentrate on those unfolding in the open market, meticulously detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C indicates the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001807794">Check Out The Full List Of Credo Technology Group's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CRDO

BU LIP TAN Takes Money Off The Table, Sells $13.36M In Credo Technology Group Stock

Revealing a significant insider sell on June 18, John Mulleady, SVP at Dave &amp; Buster's Enter (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLAY#NASDAQ">PLAY</a>), as per the latest SEC filing.
What Happened: After conducting a thorough analysis, Mulleady sold 5,931 shares of Dave &amp; Buster's Enter. This information was disclosed in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001525769/000095017025087982//Archives/edgar/data/1525769/000095017025087982/0000950170-25-087982-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday. The total transaction value is $194,459.
During Thursday's morning session, Dave &amp; Buster's Enter shares down by 1.93%, currently priced at $32.06.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Dave &amp; Buster's Enter</h3>
Dave &amp; Buster's Entertainment Inc owns and operates nearly a hundred entertainment and dining establishments in the United States where customers can eat, drink, play games, and watch televised sports. Each store offers a full menu of entries and appetizers, a complete selection of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, and an extensive assortment of entertainment attractions centered around playing games and watching live sports and other televised events. It derives maximum revenue from Entertainment.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's Financials</h3>
Revenue Growth: Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 30 April, 2025, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -3.47%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company excels with a remarkable gross margin of 85.54%, indicating superior cost efficiency and profitability compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's EPS is below the industry average, signaling challenges in bottom-line performance with a current EPS of 0.63.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 21.88. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.
Understanding Financial Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The current P/E ratio of 29.99 is below industry norms, indicating potential undervaluation and presenting an investment opportunity.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 0.59 is below industry norms, suggesting potential undervaluation and presenting an investment opportunity for those considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With an EV/EBITDA ratio lower than industry averages at 10.51, Dave &amp; Buster's Enter could be considered undervalued.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Illuminating the Importance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Investors should view insider transactions as part of a multifaceted analysis and not rely solely on them for decision-making.
Considering the legal perspective, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, according to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are mandated to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Pointing towards optimism, a company insider's new purchase signals their positive anticipation for the stock to rise.
Nevertheless, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be influenced by various factors.
<h3>Transaction Codes To Focus On</h3>
When dissecting transactions, the focal point for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> is often those occurring in the open market, meticulously detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C indicates the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001525769">Check Out The Full List Of Dave &amp; Buster's Enter's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PLAY

Insider Selling: John Mulleady Unloads $194K Of Dave & Buster's Enter Stock

It was reported on June 18, that Gary Charles Robb, Chief Business Officer at Corcept Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CORT#NASDAQ">CORT</a>) executed a significant insider sell, according to an SEC filing.
What Happened: Robb's recent Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001088856/000095017025088005//Archives/edgar/data/1088856/000095017025088005/0000950170-25-088005-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Wednesday unveiled the sale of 3,185 shares of Corcept Therapeutics. The total transaction value is $225,402.
The latest market snapshot at Thursday morning reveals Corcept Therapeutics shares down by 0.85%, trading at $71.24.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Corcept Therapeutics</h3>
Corcept Therapeutics Inc is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of medications that treat severe metabolic, oncologic and neuropsychiatric disorders by modulating the effect of the hormone cortisol. The company's compounds are being evaluated in clinical trials as potential treatments for a variety of serious disorders - hypercortisolism, advanced ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, ALS, and MASH.
<h3>Corcept Therapeutics: A Financial Overview</h3>
Revenue Growth: Over the 3 months period, Corcept Therapeutics showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 7.09% as of 31 March, 2025. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Health Care sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.
Exploring Profitability:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 98.47%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Corcept Therapeutics's EPS lags behind the industry average, indicating concerns and potential challenges with a current EPS of 0.19.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Corcept Therapeutics's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.01, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
Insights into Valuation Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Corcept Therapeutics's stock is currently priced at a premium level, as reflected in the higher-than-average P/E ratio of 62.48.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 12.15 is above industry norms, reflecting an elevated valuation for Corcept Therapeutics's stock and potential overvaluation based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Corcept Therapeutics's EV/EBITDA ratio stands at 64.93, surpassing industry benchmarks. This places the company in a position with a higher-than-average market valuation.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company exhibits a lower market capitalization profile, positioning itself below industry averages. This suggests a smaller scale relative to peers.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Relevance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Insider transactions shouldn't be used primarily to make an investing decision, however, they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
In legal terms, an "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of a company's equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This can include executives in the c-suite and large hedge funds. These insiders are required to let the public know of their transactions via a Form 4 filing, which must be filed within two business days of the transaction.
When a company insider makes a new purchase, that is an indication that they expect the stock to rise.
Insider sells, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean that the seller thinks the stock will go down. 
<h3>Unlocking the Meaning of Transaction Codes</h3>
Navigating through the landscape of transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> often prioritize those unfolding in the open market, precisely detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001088856">Check Out The Full List Of Corcept Therapeutics's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CORT

Insider Decision: Gary Charles Robb Offloads $225K Worth Of Corcept Therapeutics Stock

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) and its primary competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>34.99</td>
<td>7.46</td>
<td>3.55</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>$36.48</td>
<td>$78.69</td>
<td>8.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>15.41</td>
<td>1.95</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>-15.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.99</td>
<td>3.17</td>
<td>2.71</td>
<td>4.59%</td>
<td>$16.09</td>
<td>$54.73</td>
<td>10.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>58.78</td>
<td>24.21</td>
<td>5.41</td>
<td>10.56%</td>
<td>$0.92</td>
<td>$2.77</td>
<td>36.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>201.79</td>
<td>11.73</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$2.32</td>
<td>11.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>8.08</td>
<td>1.47</td>
<td>0.30</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>$14.27</td>
<td>$47.85</td>
<td>15.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>18.61</td>
<td>7.21</td>
<td>3.68</td>
<td>9.95%</td>
<td>$0.77</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>1.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.67</td>
<td>1.37</td>
<td>0.53</td>
<td>4.85%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$6.08</td>
<td>-4.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>35.73</td>
<td>4.12</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>11.38</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>8.97%</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>$0.69</td>
<td>-1.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.30</td>
<td>3.70</td>
<td>2.26</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.96</td>
<td>18.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>0.69</td>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>0.84%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>-4.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>71.21</td>
<td>3.74</td>
<td>1.07</td>
<td>-1.13%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>7.77</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td>0.06</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$1.4</td>
<td>-4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>121.42</td>
<td>7.34</td>
<td>0.31</td>
<td>11.93%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>4.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>42.2</td>
<td>5.31</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$6.82</td>
<td>$17.12</td>
<td>6.14%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon analyzing Amazon.com, the following trends can be observed: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 34.99 significantly below the industry average by 0.83x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 7.46 relative to the industry average by 1.4x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.55, surpassing the industry average by 2.05x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 5.79% is 1.13% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.48 Billion, which is 5.35x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $78.69 Billion, which indicates 4.6x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 8.62% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 6.14%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345251_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Amazon.com stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.
</li>
<li>
With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE ratio is low compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting a premium valuation based on book value and sales. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong profitability and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

AMZN

Investigating Amazon.com's Standing In Broadline Retail Industry Compared To Competitors

A large exercise of company stock options by Abigail H Perkins, Chief Information Officer at StoneX Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNEX#NASDAQ">SNEX</a>) was disclosed in a new SEC filing on June 18, as part of an insider exercise.
What Happened: A notable Form 4 filing on Wednesday with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000913760/000091376025000112//Archives/edgar/data/913760/000091376025000112/0000913760-25-000112-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> revealed that Perkins, Chief Information Officer at StoneX Group, exercised stock options for 16,767 shares of SNEX, resulting in a transaction value of $973,995.
Currently, StoneX Group shares are trading up 0.9%, priced at $85.67 during Thursday's morning. This values Perkins's 16,767 shares at $973,995.
<h3>Get to Know StoneX Group Better</h3>
StoneX Group Inc is a Global brokerage and financial services firm. Its service offerings are execution, OTC / Market-Making, advisory services, Global payment solutions, market intelligence, Physical Trading and clearing services. The firm operates in four segments: Commercial, Institutional, Self-Directed/Retail, and Payments. Its customers include governmental and nongovernmental organizations, commercial banks, brokers, institutional investors, and investment banks. The company operates in the United States, South America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia, and other countries, out of which the majority of revenue is generated from the Middle East and Asia Region.
<h3>StoneX Group: Delving into Financials</h3>
Revenue Growth: StoneX Group displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 66.88%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Financials sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.
Holistic Profitability Examination:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: With a low gross margin of 1.6%, the company exhibits below-average profitability, signaling potential struggles in cost efficiency compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): StoneX Group's EPS outshines the industry average, indicating a strong bottom-line trend with a current EPS of 1.49.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 7.42, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
Valuation Analysis:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The P/E ratio of 14.4 is lower than the industry average, implying a discounted valuation for StoneX Group's stock.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: With a lower-than-average P/S ratio of 0.03, the stock presents an attractive valuation, potentially signaling a buying opportunity for investors interested in sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Indicated by a lower-than-industry-average EV/EBITDA ratio of 9.34, the company suggests a potential undervaluation, which might be advantageous for value-focused investors.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Why Insider Transactions Are Important</h3>
Insightful as they may be, insider transactions should be considered alongside a thorough examination of other investment criteria.
In the realm of legality, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are required to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Notably, when a company insider makes a new purchase, it is considered an indicator of their positive expectations for the stock.
Conversely, insider sells may not necessarily signal a bearish stance on the stock and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Insider Transaction Codes</h3>
Digging into the details of stock transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> frequently turn their attention to those taking place in the open market, as outlined in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 indicates a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0000913760">Check Out The Full List Of StoneX Group's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

SNEX

Abigail H Perkins At StoneX Group Decides to Exercises Options Worth $973K

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) against its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>30.47</td>
<td>43.75</td>
<td>7.43</td>
<td>37.11%</td>
<td>$32.25</td>
<td>$44.87</td>
<td>5.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>23.43</td>
<td>4.03</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>1.72%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>19.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>17.21</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>0.76</td>
<td>-4.4%</td>
<td>$0.87</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>5.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>18.20</td>
<td>19.88</td>
<td>3.28</td>
<td>33.42%</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>$1.19</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>20.06</td>
<td>3.95</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>5.86%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$0.91</td>
<td>30.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>137.82</td>
<td>13.76</td>
<td>5.53</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.54</td>
<td>12.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>12.12</td>
<td>0.84</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>-1.66%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>17.64</td>
<td>2.18</td>
<td>0.72</td>
<td>-0.55%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>14.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>35.21</td>
<td>6.52</td>
<td>1.91</td>
<td>4.76%</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>12.29%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a detailed examination of Apple, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 30.47 is 0.87x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 43.75 relative to the industry average by 6.71x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 7.43, which is 3.89x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 37.11% is 32.35% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.25 Billion is 129.0x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $44.87 Billion, which indicates 59.04x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 5.08% compared to the industry average of 12.29%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345241_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio helps evaluate the capital structure and financial leverage of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Apple can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When evaluating the debt-to-equity ratio, Apple is in the middle position among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company maintains a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.47, suggesting a relatively balanced financial structure.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Apple demonstrates strong performance compared to its industry peers, showcasing solid financial health and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

In-Depth Analysis: Apple Versus Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

In the fast-paced and highly competitive business world of today, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry observers. In this article, we will conduct an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. Through a detailed examination of key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and illuminate company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>27.26</td>
<td>9.47</td>
<td>10.66</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$22.52</td>
<td>$34.74</td>
<td>16.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>19.64</td>
<td>6.18</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$46.31</td>
<td>$53.87</td>
<td>12.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>8.50</td>
<td>0.79</td>
<td>1.60</td>
<td>2.89%</td>
<td>$9.8</td>
<td>$14.96</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reddit Inc</td>
<td>26.82</td>
<td>11.14</td>
<td>16.46</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>61.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>12.70</td>
<td>4.98</td>
<td>6.44</td>
<td>0.19%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>15.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>31.25</td>
<td>3.59</td>
<td>7.66</td>
<td>3.38%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.61</td>
<td>12.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trump Media &amp; Technology Group Corp</td>
<td>16.68</td>
<td>5.75</td>
<td>1019.39</td>
<td>-3.51%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>6.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>81.42</td>
<td>1.95</td>
<td>2.85</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-1.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CarGurus Inc</td>
<td>84.27</td>
<td>7.67</td>
<td>3.64</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.96</td>
<td>0.69</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>3.09%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>0.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>17.36</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>3.31%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>7.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>33.85</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>1.05</td>
<td>-1.39%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>0.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>1.04</td>
<td>3.21%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>-1.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>18.05</td>
<td>0.73</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>1.37%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taboola.com Ltd</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>1.17</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>-0.85%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>3.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vtex</td>
<td>89.03</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>0.34%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>36.43</td>
<td>3.72</td>
<td>71.75</td>
<td>2.23%</td>
<td>$3.82</td>
<td>$4.95</td>
<td>8.83%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely studying Meta Platforms, we can observe the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 27.26, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.75x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 9.47 which exceeds the industry average by 2.55x.
</li>
<li>
Based on its sales performance, the stock could be deemed undervalued with a Price to Sales ratio of 10.66, which is 0.15x the industry average.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.05% that is 6.82% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.52 Billion, which is 5.9x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $34.74 Billion, which indicates 7.02x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 16.07%, which surpasses the industry average of 8.83%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345233_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Meta Platforms in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is high, suggesting a premium on assets. The PS ratio is low, signaling a favorable sales valuation. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms industry peers, reflecting strong profitability and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparing Meta Platforms With Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Intuit's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTU#NYSE">INTU</a>) short percent of float has risen 8.03% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 4.01 million shares sold short, which is 1.48% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 1.68 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Intuit Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345228_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Intuit has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Intuit's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Intuit's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 2.95%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

INTU

What's Driving the Market Sentiment Around Intuit?

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Software industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>36.94</td>
<td>11.04</td>
<td>13.22</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$40.71</td>
<td>$48.15</td>
<td>13.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>47.97</td>
<td>27.84</td>
<td>10.39</td>
<td>18.18%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>12.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>136.35</td>
<td>20.53</td>
<td>18.30</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>18.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>116.12</td>
<td>18.63</td>
<td>16.13</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$1.67</td>
<td>15.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>42.34</td>
<td>40.12</td>
<td>12.96</td>
<td>25.08%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>13.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>28.90</td>
<td>8.14</td>
<td>4.72</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$0.53</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>289.40</td>
<td>13.34</td>
<td>14.70</td>
<td>2.57%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>30.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>111.90</td>
<td>25.52</td>
<td>8.53</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>28.05</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>3.61%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>1.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>28.67</td>
<td>10.23</td>
<td>8.37</td>
<td>9.75%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>9.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>49.98</td>
<td>6.32</td>
<td>3.50</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>28.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>15.71</td>
<td>13.40</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>30.24%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>101.62</td>
<td>1.98</td>
<td>3.26</td>
<td>-0.93%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>3.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>56.91</td>
<td>28.43</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>5.98%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>81.07</td>
<td>16.71</td>
<td>8.41</td>
<td>9.39%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>11.89%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By thoroughly analyzing Microsoft, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 36.94, which is 0.46x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 11.04, which is well below the industry average by 0.66x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 13.22, which is 1.57x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.27%, which is 1.12% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company exhibits higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $40.71 Billion, which is 61.68x above the industry average, implying stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $48.15 Billion, which indicates 35.4x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 13.27% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 11.89%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345224_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio provides insights into the proportion of debt a company has in relation to its equity and asset value.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating Microsoft alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Microsoft has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is also low, suggesting a possible bargain opportunity. However, the PS ratio is high, signaling rich valuation based on revenue. In terms of fundamentals, Microsoft's low ROE may raise concerns, while its high EBITDA and gross profit reflect strong operational performance. Additionally, the high revenue growth implies a promising outlook for the company's future prospects compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

A June filing shows that Senator Jerry Moran reported a purchase in Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>), valued between $4,004 and $60,000. The transaction date is listed as May 8, 2025, with the report published on June 18, 2025.
At present, Alphabet shares are trading down 1.48% at $174.6.
<h3>Senator's Recent Trading Activity</h3>
Over the previous three years, Jerry Moran conducted 54 trades, totaling more than $82 thousand. The largest of these were in Halliburton and Berkshire Hathaway Cl B stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Sen. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Alphabet (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Jerry Moran's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet</td>
<td>GOOG</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet</td>
<td>GOOG</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet</td>
<td>GOOG</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet</td>
<td>GOOG</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-08</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
To keep an eye on Jerry Moran's trades and other government stock activity, check out our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/jerry-moran">real-time tracking tool</a>!
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

GOOG

A Congress Member Bought Up To $60K In Alphabet Stock: Here's What You Need To Know

McKesson's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MCK#NYSE">MCK</a>) short percent of float has risen 5.95% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 2.23 million shares sold short, which is 1.78% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.65 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>McKesson Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345223_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for McKesson has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing McKesson's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, McKesson's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.90%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

How Do Investors Really Feel About McKesson?

In the current market session, SM Energy Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SM#NYSE">SM</a>) share price is at $27.55, after a 1.36% decrease. Over the past month, the stock increased by 18.85%, but over the past year, it actually fell by 42.76%. With good short-term performance like this, and questionable long-term performance, long-term shareholders might want to start looking into the company's price-to-earnings ratio.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345221_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>A Look at SM Energy P/E Relative to Its Competitors</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
SM Energy has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 34.0 of the Oil, Gas &amp; Consumable Fuels industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345221_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

P/E Ratio Insights for SM Energy

Ecolab (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ECL#NYSE">ECL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 2.68% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 11.03%. Currently, Ecolab has a market capitalization of $73.81 billion. 
Buying $1000 In ECL: If an investor had bought $1000 of ECL stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $8,206.24 today based on a price of $260.22 for ECL at the time of writing.
<h3>Ecolab's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345219_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$1000 Invested In This Stock 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

June 18, 2025 records indicate that Representative Kelly Morrison filed a sale of Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZBRA#NASDAQ">ZBRA</a>), valued between $31,017 and $290,000. According to the June filing, the transaction occurred on June 4, 2025.
Currently, Zebra Technologies shares are trading up 0.82% at $291.73.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
Over the previous three years, Kelly Morrison conducted 62 trades, totaling more than $1.14 million. The largest of these were in Target and Meta Platforms stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZBRA#NASDAQ">ZBRA</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HLI#NYSE">HLI</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Kelly Morrison's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Houlihan Lokey</td>
<td>HLI</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-06-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nike</td>
<td>NKE</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-06-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nike</td>
<td>NKE</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-06-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ResMed</td>
<td>RMD</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-06-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ResMed</td>
<td>RMD</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-06-04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Stay informed on Kelly Morrison's trades and other members of Congress with our real-time <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/kelly-morrison">government trades tracking tool</a>!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AVGO

ZBRA

Recent Report Shows That Rep. Kelly Morrison Sold Up to $290K Worth of Zebra Technologies Stock

Healthpeak Properties's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DOC#NYSE">DOC</a>) short percent of float has fallen 8.74% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 14.86 million shares sold short, which is 2.82% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 1.97 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Healthpeak Properties Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345218_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Healthpeak Properties has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Healthpeak Properties's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Healthpeak Properties's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 6.77%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Peering Into Healthpeak Properties's Recent Short Interest

In the fast-paced and highly competitive business world of today, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry observers. In this article, we will conduct an extensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. Through a detailed examination of key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and illuminate company's performance in the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.49</td>
<td>41.92</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>23.01%</td>
<td>$22.58</td>
<td>$26.67</td>
<td>69.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>91.01</td>
<td>16.86</td>
<td>21.11</td>
<td>7.12%</td>
<td>$8.02</td>
<td>$10.2</td>
<td>20.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>25.32</td>
<td>7.18</td>
<td>10.43</td>
<td>8.19%</td>
<td>$608.71</td>
<td>$493.4</td>
<td>41.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>92.77</td>
<td>3.56</td>
<td>7.48</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$1.59</td>
<td>$3.74</td>
<td>35.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>37.44</td>
<td>10.95</td>
<td>11.32</td>
<td>7.08%</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>11.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>15.76</td>
<td>6.12</td>
<td>4.11</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$3.67</td>
<td>$6.04</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>192.96</td>
<td>22.42</td>
<td>38.39</td>
<td>3.17%</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$1.21</td>
<td>33.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>28.79</td>
<td>2.77</td>
<td>4.34</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.96</td>
<td>38.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>61.80</td>
<td>3.22</td>
<td>11.55</td>
<td>1.63%</td>
<td>$1.2</td>
<td>$1.61</td>
<td>22.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>18.43</td>
<td>10.13</td>
<td>14.07</td>
<td>4.17%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>39.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>24.41</td>
<td>1.45</td>
<td>2.19</td>
<td>0.32%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-27.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>20.14</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$27.16</td>
<td>$24.89</td>
<td>11.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>36.76</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>-5.78%</td>
<td>$-0.37</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>-22.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>12.94</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.53</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$23.86</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>5.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>12.23</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>3.63</td>
<td>2.59%</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>274.86</td>
<td>19.86</td>
<td>33.06</td>
<td>5.63%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>25.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>27.94</td>
<td>1.81</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-8.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>138.24</td>
<td>2.20</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>0.93%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>-7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>31.66</td>
<td>4.36</td>
<td>11.19</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>132.11</td>
<td>9.49</td>
<td>13.82</td>
<td>0.71%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-14.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>67.14</td>
<td>6.88</td>
<td>10.46</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$35.87</td>
<td>$29.72</td>
<td>12.04%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a detailed examination of NVIDIA, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 46.49 is 0.69x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 41.92, which is 6.09x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 24.0, surpassing the industry average by 2.29x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.01%, which is 19.85% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.58 Billion, which is 0.63x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $26.67 Billion, which indicates 0.9x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 69.18% exceeds the industry average of 12.04%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1750345215_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.12, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests that NVIDIA may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the stock may be overvalued based on its book value and sales. On the other hand, the high ROE, low EBITDA, low gross profit, and high revenue growth suggest that NVIDIA is performing well in terms of profitability and growth compared to its industry counterparts.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Performance Comparison: NVIDIA And Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

June 18, 2025 records indicate that Representative Rick Allen filed a purchase of Netflix (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>), valued between $16,002 and $65,000. According to the June filing, the transaction occurred on May 16, 2025.
Currently, Netflix shares are trading down 0.03% at $1220.25.
<h3>Representative's Recent Trading Activity</h3>
In the last three years, Rick Allen completed 51 stock transactions totaling more than $1.65 million. SouthState and Accenture stocks were among the largest trades. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Netflix (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TMO#NYSE">TMO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TMO#NYSE">TMO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Rick Allen's recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Netflix</td>
<td>NFLX</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
<td>TMO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-05-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Us Treasury Bill 912797Ms3 Due</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-05-16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Us Treasury Bill Due</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-04-15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Us Treasury Bill Due 3/15/2027</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>$50,001 - $100,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-04-15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
To keep an eye on Rick Allen's trades and other government stock activity, check out our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/rick-allen">real-time tracking tool</a>!
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NFLX

Recent Report Shows That Rep. Rick Allen Bought Up to $65K Worth of Netflix Stock

In 2017, the vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and Warren <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/12/42686059/warren-and-i-arent-prodigies-charlie-munger-said-knowing-what-you-dont-know-is-more-useful-than-being-brilliant">Buffett's</a><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/12/42686059/warren-and-i-arent-prodigies-charlie-munger-said-knowing-what-you-dont-know-is-more-useful-than-being-brilliant"> longtime business partner</a>, Charlie Munger, visited the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. He was interviewed by Dean Scott DeRue, sharing insights into his and the company's phenomenal success. His key message: long-term business success stems from thinking like an owner, not a corporate climber.
What Happened: Munger recalled how Buffett, in the early stages of his career, followed <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/entertainment/24/05/39080466/5-investment-lessons-from-benjamin-grahams-book-the-intelligent-investor-which-warren-buffe">Ben Graham's approach</a> of buying companies simply because they were undervalued, even if they were doomed.
Eventually, they abandoned that model in favor of acquiring high-quality businesses with lasting advantages. The turning point, Munger explained, was a change in mindset. "A lot of people running the businesses think like careerists," he said. "<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/02/43903504/charlie-mungers-financial-success-and-longevity-advice-my-game-in-life-was-always-to-avoid-all-standard-ways-of-failing">My advice to you</a> is you never want to be a careerist so much that you don&#8217;t see it from the owner&#8217;s point of view." Reflecting on their journey, he added, "We thought like capitalists, because we were always in the shareholder mindset."
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"> 
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="A Conversation with Charlie Munger and Michigan Ross - 2017" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S9HgIGzOENA?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
</figure>
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/real-estate/25/06/46000636/warren-buffetts-real-estate-business-sounds-alarm-overpriced-homes-need-reductions">Warren Buffett&#8217;s Real Estate Business Sounds Alarm: &#8216;Overpriced&#8217; Homes Need Reductions</a>
Why It Matters: Munger pointed to General Motors as a cautionary tale. "The mightiest company in the world went bankrupt," he said.
"They had a bunch of careerists, and an owner would have seen immediately that situation was hopeless. And they just romped through it with a lot of denials and stupidity and pomposity, and of course they went bankrupt," Munger noted.
Munger was referring to what was then the <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/danbigman/2013/10/30/how-general-motors-was-really-saved-the-untold-true-story-of-the-most-important-bankruptcy-in-u-s-history/">largest bankruptcy in history</a>, when, on <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/18/06/11814018/this-day-in-market-history-general-motors-declares-bankruptcy">June 1, 2009</a>, General Motors filed for bankruptcy in New York, listing $82 billion in assets and $173 billion in liabilities.
"None of those hotshot executives thought like an owner, or they would have seen that it was hopeless," Munger reiterated.
Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/real-estate/25/06/45995200/when-the-skies-rain-gold-warren-buffett-says-to-carry-a-washtub-heres-where-its-pouring-right-now">When The Skies &#8216;Rain Gold&#8217; Warren Buffett Says To Carry A Washtub – Here&#8217;s Where It&#8217;s Pouring Right Now</a>
Image Via Shutterstock

Comments

Nature Wood Gr

Noticias

Últimas noticias sobre Nature Wood Gr (NASDAQ:NWGL) Bolsa

La gente también mira

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL