La cadena de opciones muestra datos clave de las opciones de acciones de iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF a varios precios de ejercicio y fechas de vencimiento. Los operadores utilizan esta información para analizar posibles operaciones y evaluar el sentimiento del mercado para iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF..

iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (NASDAQ:ETHA) Bolsa, Cadena de Opciones

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

News

Markets

ETFs

$BTC

$ETH

ETHA

ETHE

Fidelity Ethereum Fund Fidelity Ethereum Fund

FETH

Jamie Dimon, el CEO del gigante bancario JPMorgan, ha reconocido la importancia de las criptomonedas basadas en contratos inteligentes, en marcado contraste con su postura sobre Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).

Jamie Dimon reconoce el valor de las criptomonedas con contratos inteligentes, sigue rechazando Bitcoin

ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF

ARKB

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund

FBTC

GBTC

IBIT

El gigante de la banca de inversión Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) adquirió más acciones de los fondos cotizados en bolsa (ETF) de Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) y Ethereum (CRYPTO: 

Goldman Sachs apuesta fuerte por Bitcoin y Ethereum: sus tenencias superan los 2.000M$

General

$DOGE

El gestor de fondos índice de criptomonedas Bitwise Asset Management presentó este miércoles una solicitud para un fondo cotizado en bolsa (ETF) de Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE), lo que llevó a los analistas a prever grandes rendimientos para la criptomoneda inspirada en memes.

¿Dogecoin (DOGE) alcanzará los 15$? ETF de Bitwise podría disparar la criptomoneda meme

iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF

Ethan Allen Interiors Inc

Goldman Sachs analyst Thiago Ojea maintains Ternium (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TX#NYSE">TX</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $39 to $35.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Ternium, Lowers Price Target to $35

WIIM

ALAB

AMAT

AOSL

CAMT

CRDO

INDI

MTSI

NVMI

ONTO

POWI

QCOM

QRVO

RGTI

RMBS

SITM

SLAB

SMTC

SYNA

TSEM

Shares of semiconductor companies are trading lower as markets react to President Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs.

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains T. Rowe Price Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TROW#NASDAQ">TROW</a>) with a Sell and lowers the price target from $103 to $89.

TROW

Goldman Sachs Maintains Sell on T. Rowe Price Group, Lowers Price Target to $89

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Stifel Financial (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SF#NYSE">SF</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $121 to $105.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Neutral on Stifel Financial, Lowers Price Target to $105

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Raymond James Finl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RJF#NYSE">RJF</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $198 to $173.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Raymond James Finl, Lowers Price Target to $173

Analysts weigh in on the impact<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/04/44616760/donald-trump-sets-reciprocal-tariffs-on-key-trade-partners-in-historic-policy-shock"> newly imposed reciprocal tariffs</a> by President Donald Trump on other countries and the effect it could have on Apple Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) and its products, such as the iPhone.
The Apple Analysts: Rosenblatt analyst Barton Crockett maintained a Buy rating on Apple with a $263 price target.
Tigress Financial analyst Ivan Feinseth reiterated a Strong Buy rating on Apple and raised the price target from $295 to $300.
Read Also:<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/tech/25/03/44544129/exclusive-which-magnificent-7-stock-will-perform-best-in-the-next-3-months-new-poll-shows-a-favorite-and-its-not-nvidia"> EXCLUSIVE: Which Magnificent 7 Stock Will Perform Best In The Next 3 Months? New Poll Shows A Favorite (And It&#8217;s Not Nvidia)</a>
Rosenblatt on AAPL: American icon Apple could be severely impacted by the tariffs, Crockett said in a new investor note.
"Trump tariffs could blow up Apple," Crockett said.
The analyst said the quick math suggests Apple could face $39.5 billion of tariff costs.
"We believe that close to 100% of iPhones sold in the U.S. are made in China, 90% of Macs, 80% of iPads, 90% of Apple Watches and 35% of Airpods."
The analyst said these products are also made in Vietnam. Tariffs on China and Vietnam are 54% and 46%, respectively.
"This looks pretty tough."
Without Apple raising prices, the analyst estimates that operating profits and earnings per share could be down by around 32% annually. Raising prices could offset demand, the analyst warned.
"We note that Apple's main rival in the U.S., Samsung, is based in South Korea upon which Trump just levied 25% tariffs. So Samsung, as it stands now, could be meaningfully competitively advantaged, tariff-wise."
Crockett also questions if China will retaliate and try to hurt Apple in the country to help its own local smartphone makers.
The analyst said Apple moving iPhone production to the U.S. would be "hard to do economically" and can't happen for years.
Tigress on AAPL: Services growth and the integration of Apple Intelligence are future catalysts for Apple, Feinseth writes in a new investor note.
The analyst said these two items and Apple's growing customer base will "continue to drive ongoing revenue and cash flow growth."
"AAPL's ongoing integration of Apple Intelligence will increasingly enhance the cadence of new product introductions and drive Services growth and further growth of its ecosystem," Feinseth said.
Feinseth said Apple Intelligence will help grow new product sales and Services revenue in the future.
"Strength in Services revenue continues to be driven by expanded application and services with new offerings in Apple Arcade games and new programming on Fitness+."
The analyst highlighted Apple's installed base of active devices hitting an all-time high in the most recently reported quarter.
"AAPL remains a must-own stock driven by its industry leadership position and significant Economic Earnings power, brand equity, loyal customer base, cash generation ability, increasingly strong balance sheet, and ability to innovate to create new products as it expands its ecosystem."
AAPL Price Action: Apple stock is down 8.73% to $204.31 on Thursday at publication versus a 52-week trading range of $164.08 to $260.09. Apple stock is down 15.6% year-to-date in 2025.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/technicals/25/04/44629335/apple-stock-slammed-by-trump-tariffs-is-a-death-cross-next">Apple Stock Slammed By Trump Tariffs: Is A Death Cross Next?</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

Analyst Color

Reiteration

Global

Tech

AAPL

'Trump Tariffs Could Blow Up Apple': Analyst Estimates $39.5 Billion Impact

Goldman Sachs analyst Michael Ng maintains Penguin Solutions (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PENG#NASDAQ">PENG</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $26 to $22.5.

Penguin Solutions, Inc. - Ordinary Shares

PENG

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Penguin Solutions, Lowers Price Target to $22.5

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Marex Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRX#NASDAQ">MRX</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $40 to $44.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Marex Group, Raises Price Target to $44

BROS

CAVA

DASH

SBUX

SHAK

Shares of restaurant-related companies are trading lower as markets react to President Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs.

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JHG#NYSE">JHG</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $47 to $41.

Janus Henderson Group plc Ordinary Shares

Goldman Sachs Maintains Neutral on Janus Henderson Group, Lowers Price Target to $41

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Invesco (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IVZ#NYSE">IVZ</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $18.5 to $17.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Neutral on Invesco, Lowers Price Target to $17

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>) stock's wild ride in 2024 has been painful for its leveraged ETFs, and now, the charts are flashing a classic technical red flag: the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/death-cross">dreaded Death Cross</a>.
Both the Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLL#NASDAQ">TSLL</a>) and the GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLR#NASDAQ">TSLR</a>) have succumbed to this bearish indicator, raising the question: Are things about to get worse, or is this the perfect contrarian bullish signal?
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/04/44630091/teslas-ev-crown-at-risk-as-byd-closes-in-with-breakthrough-charging-tech">Tesla&#8217;s EV Crown At Risk As BYD Closes In With Breakthrough Charging Tech</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tesla&#8217;s Stagnation Weighs On TSLL, TSLR</h2>
Tesla stock is down over 30% year-to-date and has shed 7% in the past month, leaving its leveraged ETFs in the dust. TSLL is down nearly 60% YTD, while TSLR is off by almost 59%.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="631" height="489" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112852/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.17-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-855895" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112852/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.17-PM.png 631w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112852/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.17-PM-300x232.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 631px) 100vw, 631px" /></a></figure>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chart created using Benzinga Pro</a>
A Death Cross, where the 50-day moving average falls below the 200-day moving average, has materialized for both ETFs, typically signaling a prolonged downside.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="631" height="489" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112905/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.26-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-855898" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112905/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.26-PM.png 631w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03112905/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.48.26-PM-300x232.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 631px) 100vw, 631px" /></a></figure>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chart created using Benzinga Pro</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mixed Signals: A Rebound On The Horizon?</h2>
Despite the ominous chart patterns, there are glimmers of hope. 
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="631" height="489" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03113001/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.53.46-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-855899" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03113001/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.53.46-PM.png 631w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/03113001/Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-8.53.46-PM-300x232.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 631px) 100vw, 631px" /></a></figure>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?utm_adType=bzprocontent&amp;utm_campaign=14daytrial&amp;utm_ad=0403" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chart created using Benzinga Pro</a>
Tesla stock, at $266.18 is above its 20-day simple moving averages (SMAs), indicating short-term buying pressure. The same holds true for TSLL and TSLR, where prices have recently climbed above their 20-day SMAs. 
Historically, leveraged ETFs can stage vicious comebacks when the underlying stock finds its footing.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Death Cross Or Buying Opportunity?</h2>
With Tesla's trend stagnating but not collapsing, traders are left with a classic dilemma: Should they ride the bearish momentum or bet on a turnaround?
If Tesla stock continues to show strength above its shorter-term moving averages, a short squeeze in TSLL and TSLR could be on the table. 
However, if the Death Cross holds true, the pain might not be over.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/04/44630499/trump-auto-tariffs-could-up-car-prices-by-15k-analyst-calls-it-pure-chaos">Trump Auto Tariffs Could Up Car Prices By $15K, Analyst Calls It &#8216;Pure Chaos&#8217;</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Specialty ETFs

Technicals

Trading Ideas

TSLA

TSLL

TSLR

Tesla Leveraged ETFs Hit A Death Cross: Is A Short Squeeze Next For TSLL, TSLR?

Goldman Sachs analyst Alexander Blostein maintains Ares Management (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARES#NYSE">ARES</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $188 to $166.

ARES

Goldman Sachs Maintains Buy on Ares Management, Lowers Price Target to $166

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders will search for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges heavily from its normal worth. High amounts of trading activity could push option prices to exaggerated or underestimated levels. 
Below are some instances of options activity happening in the Communication Services sector: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ROKU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>10/17/25</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$74.6K</td>
<td>1.8K</td>
<td>1.4K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>META</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/11/25</td>
<td>$580.00</td>
<td>$32.1K</td>
<td>1.4K</td>
<td>1.2K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DIS</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>05/16/25</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
<td>$29.8K</td>
<td>1.9K</td>
<td>307</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASTS</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>08/15/25</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$27.8K</td>
<td>2.5K</td>
<td>241</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VZ</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>03/20/26</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
<td>$37.1K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
<td>177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NFLX</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$850.00</td>
<td>$72.9K</td>
<td>103</td>
<td>52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GOOG</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/17/27</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$32.1K</td>
<td>318</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These bullet-by-bullet explanations have been constructed using the accompanying table. 
• Regarding ROKU (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ROKU#NASDAQ">ROKU</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 197 day(s) on October 17, 2025. Parties traded 79 contract(s) at a $60.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $74.6K, with a price of $945.0 per contract. There were 1830 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 1445 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For META (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 8 day(s) on April 11, 2025. This event was a transfer of 60 contract(s) at a $580.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $32.1K, with a price of $535.0 per contract. There were 1434 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 1288 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For DIS (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DIS#NYSE">DIS</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 43 day(s) on May 16, 2025. This event was a transfer of 21 contract(s) at a $105.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $29.8K, with a price of $1420.0 per contract. There were 1994 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 307 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding ASTS (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ASTS#NASDAQ">ASTS</a>), we observe a call option sweep with neutral sentiment. It expires in 134 day(s) on August 15, 2025. Parties traded 61 contract(s) at a $25.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 8 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $27.8K, with a price of $457.0 per contract. There were 2534 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 241 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For VZ (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VZ#NYSE">VZ</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 351 day(s) on March 20, 2026. This event was a transfer of 143 contract(s) at a $42.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $37.1K, with a price of $260.0 per contract. There were 2070 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 177 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For NFLX (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 652 day(s) on January 15, 2027. This event was a transfer of 6 contract(s) at a $850.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $72.9K, with a price of $12165.0 per contract. There were 103 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 52 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding GOOG (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>), we observe a call option trade with bullish sentiment. It expires in 805 day(s) on June 17, 2027. Parties traded 18 contract(s) at a $200.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $32.1K, with a price of $1785.0 per contract. There were 318 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 18 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more news on unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Options

ASTS

GOOG

NFLX

ROKU

7 Communication Services Stocks Whale Activity In Today's Session

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders often look for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges away from its normal worth. Abnormal amounts of trading activity could push option prices to hyperbolic or underperforming levels. 
Here's the list of options activity happening in today's session: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>TSLA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
<td>$26.8K</td>
<td>9.5K</td>
<td>84.8K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMZN</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$187.50</td>
<td>$45.3K</td>
<td>4.8K</td>
<td>12.5K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GT</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$10.00</td>
<td>$107.5K</td>
<td>5.7K</td>
<td>3.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SBUX</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$25.4K</td>
<td>2.8K</td>
<td>956</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GME</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$146.6K</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>540</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WYNN</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$1.0 million</td>
<td>819</td>
<td>461</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RH</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$220.00</td>
<td>$34.7K</td>
<td>350</td>
<td>303</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BABA</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>12/19/25</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$146.2K</td>
<td>559</td>
<td>254</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MELI</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$1930.00</td>
<td>$26.2K</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>22</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These bullet-by-bullet explanations have been constructed using the accompanying table. 
• Regarding TSLA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>), we observe a call option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. Parties traded 49 contract(s) at a $270.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 14 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $26.8K, with a price of $550.0 per contract. There were 9542 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 84887 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For AMZN (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bullish, expiring in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. This event was a transfer of 498 contract(s) at a $187.50 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $45.3K, with a price of $91.0 per contract. There were 4896 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 12545 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For GT (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GT#NASDAQ">GT</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 288 day(s) on January 16, 2026. This event was a transfer of 500 contract(s) at a $10.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $107.5K, with a price of $215.0 per contract. There were 5717 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 3060 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding SBUX (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SBUX#NASDAQ">SBUX</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 169 day(s) on September 19, 2025. Parties traded 56 contract(s) at a $80.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $25.4K, with a price of $455.0 per contract. There were 2847 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 956 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For GME (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GME#NYSE">GME</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bullish, expiring in 288 day(s) on January 16, 2026. This event was a transfer of 23 contract(s) at a $85.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $146.6K, with a price of $6375.0 per contract. There were 87 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 540 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For WYNN (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WYNN#NASDAQ">WYNN</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 78 day(s) on June 20, 2025. This event was a transfer of 461 contract(s) at a $95.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $1.0 million, with a price of $2183.0 per contract. There were 819 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 461 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For RH (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RH#NYSE">RH</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. This event was a transfer of 5 contract(s) at a $220.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $34.7K, with a price of $6949.0 per contract. There were 350 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 303 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For BABA (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BABA#NYSE">BABA</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 260 day(s) on December 19, 2025. This event was a transfer of 74 contract(s) at a $135.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 19 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $146.2K, with a price of $1980.0 per contract. There were 559 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 254 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For MELI (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MELI#NASDAQ">MELI</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be neutral, expiring in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. This event was a transfer of 20 contract(s) at a $1930.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $26.2K, with a price of $1310.0 per contract. There were 28 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 22 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more about unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

BABA

MELI

WYNN

9 Consumer Discretionary Stocks Whale Activity In Today's Session

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders will search for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges heavily from its normal worth. High amounts of trading activity could push option prices to exaggerated or underestimated levels. 
Below are some instances of options activity happening in the Information Technology sector: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>MSTR</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
<td>$36.2K</td>
<td>2.5K</td>
<td>21.2K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AAPL</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>04/04/25</td>
<td>$217.50</td>
<td>$29.6K</td>
<td>2.6K</td>
<td>9.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WULF</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>04/11/25</td>
<td>$2.50</td>
<td>$31.5K</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>5.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>05/16/25</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$137.9K</td>
<td>18.5K</td>
<td>5.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CSCO</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$52.50</td>
<td>$173.0K</td>
<td>2.7K</td>
<td>2.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZS</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/18/26</td>
<td>$170.00</td>
<td>$2.8 million</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>1.9K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ORCL</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>08/15/25</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$35.1K</td>
<td>134</td>
<td>1.2K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IBM</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>05/16/25</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$256.2K</td>
<td>1.1K</td>
<td>568</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$128.6K</td>
<td>14.0K</td>
<td>522</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STM</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
<td>$39.6K</td>
<td>534</td>
<td>201</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These bullet-by-bullet explanations have been constructed using the accompanying table. 
• For MSTR (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSTR#NASDAQ">MSTR</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bullish, expiring in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. This event was a transfer of 100 contract(s) at a $270.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $36.2K, with a price of $363.0 per contract. There were 2550 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 21202 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding AAPL (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), we observe a call option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 1 day(s) on April 4, 2025. Parties traded 2281 contract(s) at a $217.50 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 36 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $29.6K, with a price of $13.0 per contract. There were 2608 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 9112 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding WULF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WULF#NASDAQ">WULF</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bullish sentiment. It expires in 8 day(s) on April 11, 2025. Parties traded 2240 contract(s) at a $2.50 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 22 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $31.5K, with a price of $14.0 per contract. There were 179 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 5198 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding NVDA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>), we observe a call option sweep with bullish sentiment. It expires in 43 day(s) on May 16, 2025. Parties traded 310 contract(s) at a $110.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 10 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $137.9K, with a price of $445.0 per contract. There were 18536 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 5103 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding CSCO (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CSCO#NASDAQ">CSCO</a>), we observe a put option trade with bullish sentiment. It expires in 169 day(s) on September 19, 2025. Parties traded 1000 contract(s) at a $52.50 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $173.0K, with a price of $173.0 per contract. There were 2747 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 2051 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For ZS (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZS#NASDAQ">ZS</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bullish, expiring in 441 day(s) on June 18, 2026. This event was a transfer of 1336 contract(s) at a $170.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $2.8 million, with a price of $2145.0 per contract. There were 11 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 1959 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding ORCL (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ORCL#NYSE">ORCL</a>), we observe a call option sweep with neutral sentiment. It expires in 134 day(s) on August 15, 2025. Parties traded 14 contract(s) at a $120.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $35.1K, with a price of $2510.0 per contract. There were 134 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 1283 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding IBM (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IBM#NYSE">IBM</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bullish sentiment. It expires in 43 day(s) on May 16, 2025. Parties traded 350 contract(s) at a $230.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $256.2K, with a price of $731.0 per contract. There were 1151 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 568 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding MU (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MU#NASDAQ">MU</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bullish sentiment. It expires in 78 day(s) on June 20, 2025. Parties traded 80 contract(s) at a $90.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 10 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $128.6K, with a price of $1607.0 per contract. There were 14050 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 522 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding STM (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/STM#NYSE">STM</a>), we observe a put option trade with bullish sentiment. It expires in 288 day(s) on January 16, 2026. Parties traded 200 contract(s) at a $18.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $39.6K, with a price of $198.0 per contract. There were 534 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 201 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more news on unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

CSCO

MSTR

NVDA

ORCL

WULF

10 Information Technology Stocks Whale Activity In Today's Session

For more than two decades now, the Schedule 13D filing has been a quiet beacon for value hunters searching the markets for opportunity. When an activist investor files this document with the SEC, they are not merely declaring ownership of a significant stake. They are announcing intent. And in the world of investing, intent from the right party can be worth its weight in gold.
Let us be perfectly clear about something.
The initial market reaction to these filings, typically a price jump of 5 percent to 10 percent, is merely the opening act. The real performance, the one that builds genuine wealth, unfolds over the subsequent years. This is where patient capital finds its reward.
The evidence supports this assertion overwhelmingly. Academic research from Brav, Klein &amp; Zur, Greenwood &amp; Schor, and numerous others have demonstrated that companies targeted by activist investors tend to outperform the broader market by 10 percent or more in the year following a 13D filing.
That is the excess return above what the indexes earn.
When these campaigns culminate in a sale or breakup of the company, returns can surge even higher, sometimes exceeding 20 percent above market performance. This is not speculation. This is documented history.
Consider what happens when seasoned activists like Carl Icahn, Paul Singer, or Jeff Smith file these documents. Their 13D is not bureaucratic paperwork but a starting signal for substantial change.
Whether through cost reduction, divestiture of underperforming assets, or simply holding management accountable for years of mediocre results, these activists serve as catalysts for value creation that might otherwise remain dormant for years, possibly decades.
The Canadian Pacific Railway saga illustrates this perfectly.
When Bill Ackman filed his 13D in 2011, it set in motion a transformation that saw the stock more than triple by 2014. This exceptional return was not about market excitement surrounding the initial filing. It was about installing appropriate leadership, implementing operational efficiency, and executing strategies that previous management had resisted.
Such campaigns transform patient capital into significant wealth.
Not every activist effort succeeds, of course. The JCPenney situation serves as a sobering reminder of this reality.
However, the aggregate data reveals that thoughtful, persistent activist involvement typically unlocks substantial value.
This is particularly true in traditionally sleepy sectors such as real estate, industrial conglomerates, and insurance, where management often operates without significant external pressure.
As a value investor my perpetual search is for two critical elements: a margin of safety and a catalyst for recognition.
Activist 13D filings frequently provide both.
When a proven activist with a strong track record targets a company trading at a substantial discount to book value or replacement cost, you are not looking at speculation. You are looking at a defined roadmap to value realization.
This approach requires selectivity and patience. Not every filing warrants attention.
The identity of the filer, their stated objectives, and their historical track record matter tremendously. Equally important is allowing sufficient time, often 12 to 24 months, for the investment thesis to develop.
Those seeking immediate gratification might be better served elsewhere.
For investors focused on building wealth methodically, however, studying activist campaigns and their 13D filings offers a compelling opportunity.
A recent example worth monitoring involves Converium Capital, which recently disclosed increased share purchases in Franklin Street Properties (Ticker: FSP), a real estate investment trust focused on office properties.
Converium Capital operates as a Canadian asset manager employing multiple strategies to generate positive, uncorrelated returns across various market environments.
Their approach focuses on distressed and event-driven opportunities globally across the capital structure.
Franklin Street Properties, trading on the NYSE under the ticker FSP, concentrates primarily on suburban office properties in U.S. Sunbelt and select core markets.
Headquartered in Massachusetts, the REIT has historically acquired institutional-quality office buildings in markets characterized by strong demographic trends and robust business environments.
The portfolio currently emphasizes properties in Texas, Colorado, Georgia, North Carolina, and Florida.
Traditionally, FSP focused on mid-to-large Class A office buildings with stable tenancy and long-term lease agreements.
However, the significant decline in office demand following the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a fundamental strategic reassessment.
Beginning in 2021, FSP initiated an aggressive asset disposition program designed to reduce leverage, enhance liquidity, and improve operational flexibility. The company pivoted from its previous acquisition-driven growth model toward portfolio optimization and shareholder capital returns.
This disposition strategy has been central to FSP&#8217;s transformation. Since 2021, the company has sold over $1 billion in office assets, applying proceeds primarily to debt reduction while supporting modest share repurchases and dividends.
&nbsp;Management has targeted non-core or underperforming properties, particularly those with high vacancy rates or significant upcoming lease expirations.
While this approach has successfully reduced leverage, it has concurrently resulted in significant revenue and funds from operations (FFO) declines. Both portfolio size and cash flow have contracted substantially, raising legitimate questions about long-term scalability and market competitiveness.
The financial performance reflects these challenges.
Occupancy rates remain under pressure, hovering in the mid-70 percent range, below pre-pandemic levels.
Management has implemented enhanced broker incentives and tenant improvement packages to stimulate leasing activity, though market conditions remain difficult.
FSP maintains a modest quarterly dividend, reflecting a cautious capital allocation approach. FFO per share continues to decline, and the REIT trades at a substantial discount to net asset value, reflecting investor skepticism regarding both the broader office market recovery and the company specific value proposition.
The depressed valuation, elevated general and administrative costs relative to industry peers, and disappointing stock performance have attracted activist attention from Converium and other shareholders.
These investors advocate for enhanced capital returns, governance improvements, and potentially complete liquidation of assets.
The board has responded with several shareholder-friendly initiatives, including governance reforms, improved disclosure practices, and formal consideration of strategic alternatives.
Management has expressed openness to exploring additional asset sales, joint ventures, and other liquidity-enhancing measures, though stopping short of endorsing complete liquidation or company sale.
FSP&#8217;s future remains closely tied to suburban office market recovery and successful execution of further asset sales without excessive harm to its income base.
The REIT faces continued challenges from remote work trends, rising interest rates, and competitive leasing environments.
However, activist involvement and the significant discount to net asset value may provide both a valuation floor and catalyst for meaningful change.
Franklin Street Properties represents a deeply discounted, asset-rich REIT undergoing strategic transformation. Investors should closely monitor further asset sales, leasing performance, and activist developments, as these factors will likely determine whether substantial value can be unlocked in coming quarters.
For patient value investors, this situation exemplifies the potential opportunity presented by activist involvement. The deep discount to asset value provides a margin of safety, while activist pressure serves as a potential catalyst for recognition of that value. As with all such situations, the most significant returns will likely accrue not to those reacting to headlines, but to those who understand the long-term implications and possess the patience to allow the transformation to unfold.

Opinion

Alpha Buying: The Power of Activist Investors in Driving Company Performance

Roth MKM analyst Mike Niehuser maintains Idaho Strategic Resources (AMEX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IDR#AMEX">IDR</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $16.5 to $17.5.

Roth MKM Maintains Buy on Idaho Strategic Resources, Raises Price Target to $17.5

Politics

White House Is Floating The Idea Of Potentially Launching A Tariff Investigation Into Critical Minerals Imports

The retail sector is under heavy selling pressure on Thursday as Wall Street digests President Donald Trump's tougher-than-anticipated <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/04/44626421/trumps-reign-of-tariffs-unleashes-d-day-on-wall-street-analyst-warns-of-stagflation-risk">tariff plan.&nbsp;</a>
What To Know: Trump on Wednesday announced sweeping tariffs aimed at reshaping global trade and boosting American manufacturing, including a universal 10% tariff on all imports starting April 5 and&nbsp; significantly higher rates targeting around 60 countries deemed &#8220;major offenders&#8221; for imposing barriers on U.S. goods.&nbsp;
Many retailers and brands manufacture goods in China and Vietnam which now have effective tariffs rates of 54% and 46%, respectively. Stocks of companies that rely heavily on imports are experiencing significant declines as Wall Street digests the implications of the new tariff structure.&nbsp;
Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/global/25/04/44628368/trumps-tariffs-prompt-china-to-vow-countermeasures-experts-see-retaliation-likely">Trump&#8217;s Tariffs Prompt China To Vow &#8216;Countermeasures&#8217;: Experts See Retaliation Likely&nbsp;</a>
S&amp;P Global analysts recently warned that steep tariffs would affect retailers disproportionately and more severely than they had in the past.&nbsp;
&#8220;Broad-based tariffs could hurt more U.S. consumer products and retail companies this time around than in 2018,&#8221; analysts wrote.&nbsp;
&#8220;Price increases will be harder to pass along to the consumer this time around because of the recent inflation cycle and already weak consumer environment,&#8221; the analysts wrote, per The Street.&nbsp;
Approximately, one-third of footwear imports come in the U.S. from Vietnam, according to the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America. Shares of footwear companies who manufacture in Vietnam, including Nike, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NKE#NYSE">NKE</a>) and UGGS-parent Deckers Outdoor Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DECK#NYSE">DECK</a>) were down dramatically on Thursday.&nbsp;
Best Buy, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BBY#NYSE">BBY</a>) stock was on track for its worst day since March 2020. The electronics retailer sources approximately 60% of its goods from China with goods from Mexico also making up a significant percentage, <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/s-p-global-reveals-stocks-hit-hardest-by-tariffs">according</a> to S&amp;P Global.&nbsp;
Five Below, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FIVE#NASDAQ">FIVE</a>) also imports a large share of its goods and saw its stock price fall nearly 30% in Thursday's midday trading.&nbsp;
Lululemon Athletica, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LULU#NASDAQ">LULU</a>) sources approximately 40% of its products from Vietnam and 17% from Cambodia, according <a href="https://qz.com/lululemon-nike-deckers-american-eagle-tariffs-1851774516">to data</a> from Quartz. Both countries have been hit with steep tariff rates &#8211; 46% for Vietnam and 49% for Cambodia.&nbsp;
William Blair analyst Sharon Zackfia said in a note Thursday that the tariffs could result in a 7% hit to Lululemon's margins if the company takes no action.&nbsp;
Several other retail stocks were tumbling in Thursday's midday trading, including:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li>American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AEO#NYSE">AEO</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Capri Holdings Limited (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CPRI#NYSE">CPRI</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Gap, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GAP#NYSE">GAP</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Macy&#8217;s Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/M#NYSE">M</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Ralph Lauren Corp. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RL#NYSE">RL</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UA#NYSE">UA</a>)&nbsp;</li>
<li>Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/URBN#NASDAQ">URBN</a>)&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
Read Next:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/large-cap/25/03/44537429/cathie-wood-doubles-down-on-2600-tesla-stock-price-prediction">Cathie Wood Doubles Down On $2,600 Tesla Stock Price Prediction</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Comments

iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF

iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) Opciones

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL