Últimas noticias sobre ARK Innovation ETF (BATS:ARKK)

ARK Innovation ETF

Technology

Consumer Cyclical

Healthcare

Communication Services

Industrials

Financial Services

The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) that will invest under normal circumstances primarily (at least 65 percent of its assets) in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies that are relevant to the Funds investment theme of disruptive innovation. The Adviser defines disruptive innovation as the introduction of a technologically enabled new product or service that potentially changes the way the world works. The Adviser believes that companies relevant to this theme are those that rely on or benefit from the development of new products or services, technological improvements and advancements in scientific research relating to the areas of genomics (Genomic Revolution Companies); innovation in automation and manufacturing (Automation Transformation Companies), transportation, energy (Energy Transformation Companies), artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Companies) and materials; the increased use of shared technology, infrastructure and services (Next Generation Internet Companies); and technologies that make financial services more efficient (Fintech Innovation Companies).

Tesla Motors, Inc.

Roku Inc.

Coinbase Global Inc

Roblox

Block, Inc

Crispr Therapeutics Ag

Robinhood Markets Inc - A

Palantir Technologies Inc.

Intellia Therapeutics

UIPATH INC PP

Shopify Inc

Tempus Pe

Twist Bioscience

Archer Aviation Inc

Russia,Moscow,24.06.2021,Logo,Of,Financial,Investing,Fund,Ark,Invest

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Sector ETFs

Markets

ETFs

$BTC

ARKK

ARKW

COIN

HOOD

PLTR

SHOP

TSLA

Cathie Wood, CEO de Ark Invest, reafirmó su convicción en varias acciones innovadoras que, según ella, están destinadas a liderar la transformación en los índices bursátiles.

Cathie Wood apuesta por Tesla, Coinbase y Shopify como líderes disruptivos

Equities

News

ARKX

CRSP

KTOS

PACB

Ark Invest modificó su cartera vendiendo acciones de Palantir y comprando AMD y Shopify. ¿Qué estrategia hay detrás?

Ark Invest refuerza su apuesta por AMD mientras reduce exposición a Palantir

Palantir,Technologies,Japan,Logo,,Tokyo,,Japan,2024,Sep.15

MSFT

Cathie Wood apuesta fuerte por Palantir en la batalla de la IA empresarial. ¿Qué podría cambiar para Microsoft?

Palantir (PLTR) lidera la IA empresarial y desafía a Microsoft con innovaciones disruptivas

KLA's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KLAC#NYSE">KLAC</a>) short percent of float has risen 33.51% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 3.27 million shares sold short, which is 2.47% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.78 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>KLA Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222049_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for KLA has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing KLA's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, KLA's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.03%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Trading Ideas

KLAC

How Is The Market Feeling About KLA?

Fiserv's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FI#NYSE">FI</a>) short percent of float has risen 5.6% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 7.29 million shares sold short, which is 1.32% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 1.33 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Fiserv Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222043_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Fiserv has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Fiserv's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Fiserv's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 6.20%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Is the Market Bullish or Bearish on Fiserv?

In the current session, the stock is trading at $53.36, after a 1.12% spike. Over the past month, Hims &amp; Hers Health Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HIMS#NYSE">HIMS</a>) stock increased by 8.11%, and in the past year, by 159.83%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222044_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>How Does Hims &amp; Hers Health P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
The P/E ratio measures the current share price to the company's EPS. It is used by long-term investors to analyze the company's current performance against it's past earnings, historical data and aggregate market data for the industry or the indices, such as S&amp;P 500. A higher P/E indicates that investors expect the company to perform better in the future, and the stock is probably overvalued, but not necessarily. It also could indicate that investors are willing to pay a higher share price currently, because they expect the company to perform better in the upcoming quarters. This leads investors to also remain optimistic about rising dividends in the future. 
Hims &amp; Hers Health has a better P/E ratio of 77.6 than the aggregate P/E ratio of 48.44 of the Health Care Providers &amp; Services industry. Ideally, one might believe that Hims &amp; Hers Health Inc. might perform better in the future than it's industry group, but it's probable that the stock is overvalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222044_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In summary, while the price-to-earnings ratio is a valuable tool for investors to evaluate a company's market performance, it should be used with caution. A low P/E ratio can be an indication of undervaluation, but it can also suggest weak growth prospects or financial instability. Moreover, the P/E ratio is just one of many metrics that investors should consider when making investment decisions, and it should be evaluated alongside other financial ratios, industry trends, and qualitative factors. By taking a comprehensive approach to analyzing a company's financial health, investors can make well-informed decisions that are more likely to lead to successful outcomes.

Intraday Update

Hims & Hers Health, Inc. Class A Common Stock

HIMS

A Look Into Hims & Hers Health Inc's Price Over Earnings

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ULTA#NASDAQ">ULTA</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 9.64% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 21.64%. Currently, Ulta Beauty has a market capitalization of $20.82 billion. 
Buying $1000 In ULTA: If an investor had bought $1000 of ULTA stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $18,771.68 today based on a price of $463.29 for ULTA at the time of writing.
<h3>Ulta Beauty's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222042_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

ULTA

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Ulta Beauty Stock In The Last 15 Years

In the fast-paced and highly competitive business world of today, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry observers. In this article, we will conduct an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. Through a detailed examination of key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and illuminate company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>33.86</td>
<td>7.22</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>$36.48</td>
<td>$78.69</td>
<td>8.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.12</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>-15.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>3.08</td>
<td>2.63</td>
<td>4.59%</td>
<td>$16.09</td>
<td>$54.73</td>
<td>10.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>63.51</td>
<td>26.16</td>
<td>5.85</td>
<td>10.56%</td>
<td>$0.92</td>
<td>$2.77</td>
<td>36.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>203.86</td>
<td>11.85</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$2.32</td>
<td>11.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>8.08</td>
<td>1.47</td>
<td>0.30</td>
<td>4.6%</td>
<td>$14.27</td>
<td>$47.85</td>
<td>15.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>18.69</td>
<td>7.24</td>
<td>3.69</td>
<td>9.95%</td>
<td>$0.77</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>1.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.50</td>
<td>1.33</td>
<td>0.52</td>
<td>4.85%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$6.08</td>
<td>-4.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>35.39</td>
<td>4.08</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>10.93</td>
<td>3.31</td>
<td>0.96</td>
<td>8.97%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>-24.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.59</td>
<td>3.77</td>
<td>2.30</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$0.65</td>
<td>$1.96</td>
<td>18.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>6.02</td>
<td>0.75</td>
<td>0.15</td>
<td>0.84%</td>
<td>$0.68</td>
<td>$3.02</td>
<td>-40.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>74.07</td>
<td>3.89</td>
<td>1.11</td>
<td>-1.13%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>7.86</td>
<td>0.25</td>
<td>0.06</td>
<td>-0.4%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>-40.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>126.40</td>
<td>7.64</td>
<td>0.32</td>
<td>11.93%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>4.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>43.26</td>
<td>5.49</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$6.85</td>
<td>$17.24</td>
<td>-0.62%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After thoroughly examining Amazon.com, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 33.86 is lower than the industry average by 0.78x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 7.22, which is 1.32x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.44, surpassing the industry average by 1.95x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 5.79% that is 1.13% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.48 Billion is 5.33x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $78.69 Billion, which indicates 4.56x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 8.62%, outperforming the industry average of -0.62%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222042_0_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Amazon.com against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, Amazon.com is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE ratio is low compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest that the market values Amazon.com's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Insights Into Amazon.com's Performance Versus Peers In Broadline Retail Sector

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is imperative for investors and industry observers to carefully assess companies before making investment choices. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) vis-à-vis its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. Through a detailed analysis of important financial indicators, market standing, and growth potential, our goal is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>31.25</td>
<td>44.86</td>
<td>7.62</td>
<td>37.11%</td>
<td>$32.25</td>
<td>$44.87</td>
<td>5.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>22.16</td>
<td>3.81</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>1.72%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>19.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>17.08</td>
<td>0.98</td>
<td>0.75</td>
<td>-4.4%</td>
<td>$0.87</td>
<td>$2.17</td>
<td>5.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>18.45</td>
<td>20.76</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>33.42%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>5.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>18.86</td>
<td>3.71</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>5.86%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$0.91</td>
<td>30.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>143.68</td>
<td>14.36</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>-1.1%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>11.58</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>0.48</td>
<td>-1.66%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-0.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>17.24</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>-0.55%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>14.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>35.58</td>
<td>6.65</td>
<td>1.92</td>
<td>4.76%</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>9.13%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By carefully studying Apple, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 31.25, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.88x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 44.86 which exceeds the industry average by 6.75x.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 7.62, which is 3.97x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 37.11% that is 32.35% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.25 Billion, which is 124.04x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $44.87 Billion, which indicates 59.04x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 5.08%, which is much lower than the industry average of 9.13%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222033_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When evaluating Apple alongside its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights arise:
<ul>
<li>
Apple is positioned in the middle in terms of the debt-to-equity ratio compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also relying on equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.47.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Apple demonstrates strong performance compared to its industry peers, reflecting favorable financial health and operational efficiency.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Market Analysis: Apple And Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

Calavo Growers (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVGW#NASDAQ">CVGW</a>) is preparing to release its quarterly earnings on Monday, 2025-06-09. Here's a brief overview of what investors should keep in mind before the announcement.
Analysts expect Calavo Growers to report an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.53.
Calavo Growers bulls will hope to hear the company announce they've not only beaten that estimate, but also to provide positive guidance, or forecasted growth, for the next quarter.
New investors should note that it is sometimes not an earnings beat or miss that most affects the price of a stock, but the guidance (or forecast).
<h3>Past Earnings Performance</h3>
During the last quarter, the company reported an EPS beat by $0.04, leading to a 1.42% drop in the share price on the subsequent day.
Here's a look at Calavo Growers's past performance and the resulting price change:

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Quarter</th>
<th>Q1 2025</th>
<th>Q4 2024</th>
<th>Q3 2024</th>
<th>Q2 2024</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>EPS Estimate</td>
<td>0.29</td>
<td>0.30</td>
<td>0.43</td>
<td>0.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPS Actual</td>
<td>0.33</td>
<td>0.05</td>
<td>0.57</td>
<td>0.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Price Change %</td>
<td>-1.0%</td>
<td>-7.000000000000001%</td>
<td>11.0%</td>
<td>8.0%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222029_0.png" alt="eps graph" />
<h3>Tracking Calavo Growers's Stock Performance</h3>
Shares of Calavo Growers were trading at $26.61 as of June 05. Over the last 52-week period, shares are up 7.32%. Given that these returns are generally positive, long-term shareholders are likely bullish going into this earnings release. 
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CVGW/earnings">To track all earnings releases for Calavo Growers visit their earnings calendar on our site.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Earnings

CVGW

Exploring Calavo Growers's Earnings Expectations

In the ever-evolving and intensely competitive business landscape, conducting a thorough company analysis is of utmost importance for investors and industry followers. In this article, we will carry out an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Software industry. By meticulously examining key financial metrics, market positioning, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>36.14</td>
<td>10.80</td>
<td>12.94</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$40.71</td>
<td>$48.15</td>
<td>13.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>40.17</td>
<td>28.69</td>
<td>8.76</td>
<td>19.27%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>138.07</td>
<td>20.79</td>
<td>18.53</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>18.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>113.28</td>
<td>18.18</td>
<td>15.73</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$1.67</td>
<td>15.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>42.59</td>
<td>40.36</td>
<td>13.03</td>
<td>25.08%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>13.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>28.29</td>
<td>7.97</td>
<td>4.62</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$0.53</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>305</td>
<td>14.06</td>
<td>15.49</td>
<td>2.57%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>30.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>111.41</td>
<td>25.40</td>
<td>8.49</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>28.20</td>
<td>2.78</td>
<td>5.49</td>
<td>3.61%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>1.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>28.56</td>
<td>10.19</td>
<td>8.34</td>
<td>9.75%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>9.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>50.08</td>
<td>6.34</td>
<td>3.50</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>28.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>15.72</td>
<td>13.41</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>30.24%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>101.12</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>-0.93%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>3.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>56.51</td>
<td>28.23</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>5.98%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>81.46</td>
<td>16.8</td>
<td>8.32</td>
<td>9.47%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>11.42%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a thorough examination of Microsoft, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 36.14 significantly below the industry average by 0.44x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 10.8, which is 0.64x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.94, surpassing the industry average by 1.56x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.27%, which is 1.2% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $40.71 Billion, which is 61.68x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $48.15 Billion, which indicates 35.4x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 13.27%, outperforming the industry average of 11.42%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222020_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Microsoft in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the stock is undervalued compared to peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies the stock may be overvalued based on revenue. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Microsoft shows strong performance with high EBITDA and gross profit margins, along with robust revenue growth, despite a lower ROE compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

In-Depth Analysis: Microsoft Versus Competitors In Software Industry

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>45.16</td>
<td>40.72</td>
<td>23.31</td>
<td>23.01%</td>
<td>$22.58</td>
<td>$26.67</td>
<td>69.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>94.80</td>
<td>17.56</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
<td>$8.54</td>
<td>$10.14</td>
<td>24.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>24.44</td>
<td>6.93</td>
<td>10.07</td>
<td>8.19%</td>
<td>$608.71</td>
<td>$493.4</td>
<td>41.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>84.45</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>6.81</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$1.59</td>
<td>$3.74</td>
<td>35.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>36.08</td>
<td>10.55</td>
<td>10.90</td>
<td>7.08%</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>11.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>15.06</td>
<td>5.84</td>
<td>3.92</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$3.67</td>
<td>$6.04</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>172.73</td>
<td>20.07</td>
<td>34.37</td>
<td>3.17%</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>$1.21</td>
<td>33.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>25.43</td>
<td>2.44</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.96</td>
<td>38.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>59.25</td>
<td>3.09</td>
<td>11.07</td>
<td>1.63%</td>
<td>$1.2</td>
<td>$1.61</td>
<td>22.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>18.16</td>
<td>9.98</td>
<td>13.87</td>
<td>4.17%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>39.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>23.97</td>
<td>1.42</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>0.32%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-27.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>19.08</td>
<td>2.01</td>
<td>1.04</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$27.16</td>
<td>$24.89</td>
<td>11.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>34.40</td>
<td>2.58</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>-5.78%</td>
<td>$-0.37</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>-22.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>12.09</td>
<td>1.45</td>
<td>2.37</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$23.86</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>5.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>13.93</td>
<td>2.15</td>
<td>4.14</td>
<td>2.59%</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>251.72</td>
<td>18.19</td>
<td>30.28</td>
<td>5.63%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>25.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>27.65</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>2.88</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-8.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>134.62</td>
<td>2.14</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>0.93%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>-7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>4.28</td>
<td>10.97</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>126.89</td>
<td>9.12</td>
<td>13.28</td>
<td>0.71%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-14.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>63.46</td>
<td>6.57</td>
<td>9.95</td>
<td>3.21%</td>
<td>$35.9</td>
<td>$29.72</td>
<td>12.28%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By analyzing NVIDIA, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 45.16, which is 0.71x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 40.72 relative to the industry average by 6.2x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 23.31, which is 2.34x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.01%, which is 19.8% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.58 Billion, which is 0.63x below the industry average. This potentially indicates lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
The company has lower gross profit of $26.67 Billion, which indicates 0.9x below the industry average. This potentially indicates lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 69.18% exceeds the industry average of 12.28%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1749222010_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing NVIDIA against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
NVIDIA has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.12.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. The high ROE reflects efficient use of shareholder equity, while low EBITDA and gross profit may indicate operational challenges. The high revenue growth rate signals strong sales performance relative to industry peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Understanding NVIDIA's Position In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry Compared To Competitors

Conagra Brands Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CAG#NYSE">CAG</a>) <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/06/n45811981/conagra-brands-enters-into-a-definitive-agreement-with-high-liner-foods-to-divest-the-van-de-kamps" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">agreed to sell</a> its Van de Kamp&#8217;s and Mrs. Paul&#8217;s frozen seafood brands to High Liner Foods for $55 million in cash.
The transaction is expected to close by the end of July 2025. The two seafood brands generated roughly $75 million in net sales during fiscal 2024.
The divestiture is projected to reduce Conagra&#8217;s adjusted earnings per share by one cent in fiscal 2026.
Conagra CEO Sean Connolly described the sale as a strategic move to redirect resources toward faster-growing segments. 
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/dividends/25/06/45743123/wall-streets-most-accurate-analysts-spotlight-on-3-risk-off-stocks-delivering-high-divide" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wall Street&#8217;s Most Accurate Analysts Spotlight On 3 Risk Off Stocks Delivering High-Dividend Yields</a>
Proceeds from the transaction will be applied toward debt reduction, aligning with Conagra&#8217;s broader goal of improving its balance sheet while enhancing focus on innovation and brand development.
The divestiture is part of a wider shift in the packaged food industry, where companies are reassessing portfolios to match evolving consumer demands and improve operational efficiency.
Related ETFs: Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLP#NYSE">XLP</a>), iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IYK#NYSE">IYK</a>).
Price Action: Conagra shares are trading lower by 0.45% at $22.36 on Friday&#8217;s last check.
Read Next: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/06/45810364/rfk-jr-champions-medical-freedom-while-curtailing-access-say-public-health-experts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RFK Jr. Champions&#8217; Medical Freedom&#8217; While Curtailing Access, Say Public Health Experts</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Asset Sales

Conagra Sells Seafood Brands For $55M As It Sharpens Focus On Core Business

Goldman Sachs analyst Ati Modak downgrades MYR Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MYRG#NASDAQ">MYRG</a>) from Buy to Neutral and raises the price target from $145 to $168.

Downgrades

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

MYRG

Goldman Sachs Downgrades MYR Group to Neutral, Raises Price Target to $168

Petco Health and Wellness Company Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WOOF#NASDAQ">WOOF</a>) stock plunged 23.9% to $2.755 Friday morning after the company issued weaker-than-expected first-quarter sales and a cautious outlook.
What To Know: The pet retailer <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/25/06/n45802282/petco-health-wellness-company-inc-reports-first-quarter-2025-financial-results">reported</a> first-quarter net sales of $1.49 billion, slightly below Wall Street expectations of $1.5 billion and down 2.3% from $1.53 billion a year earlier. Comparable sales dropped 1.3% year-over-year.
Despite the revenue miss, Petco's quarterly loss of 4 cents per share <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/earnings/25/06/45805010/petco-stock-drops-after-q1-revenues-miss-details">matched</a> analyst estimates and remained flat compared to last year. Gross margin improved slightly to 38.2%, while operating income rose to $16.4 million from a loss in the prior year, signaling some cost improvements.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/economic-data/25/06/45812372/us-labor-markets-defies-tariff-concerns-as-nonfarm-payrolls-wages-top-expectations-in-may">US Labor Markets Defies Tariff Concerns As Nonfarm Payrolls, Wages Top Expectations In May</a>
CEO Joel Anderson reaffirmed Petco's full-year 2025 outlook, now factoring in ongoing U.S. tariffs, and emphasized efforts to restore profitability through operational improvements. For the full year, the company expects net sales to decline in the low single digits, with adjusted EBITDA forecasted between $375 million and $390 million.
Petco also provided second-quarter guidance, projecting continued modest revenue declines and adjusted EBITDA between $92 million and $94 million.
Investors appeared unimpressed, driving shares sharply lower as concerns linger over weak consumer demand and competitive pressures in the pet retail space. Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/sports/25/06/45812523/manchester-united-stock-jumps-after-q3-profit-turnaround-matchday-growth-and-stadium-plans">Manchester United Stock Jumps After Q3 Profit Turnaround, Matchday Growth, And Stadium Plans</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How To Buy WOOF Stock</h2>
Besides going to a brokerage platform to purchase a share &#8211; or fractional share &#8211; of stock, you can also gain access to shares either by buying an exchange traded fund (ETF) that holds the stock itself, or by allocating yourself to a strategy in your 401(k) that would seek to acquire shares in a mutual fund or other instrument. 
For example, in Petco Health and Wellness&#8217; case, it is in the Consumer Discretionary sector. An ETF will likely hold shares in many liquid and large companies that help track that sector, allowing an investor to gain exposure to the trends within that segment.
According to data from&nbsp;<a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>, WOOF has a 52-week high of $6.29 and a 52-week low of $2.23.
Image: Shutterstock

WOOF

Petco (WOOF) Shares Plunge After Q1 Miss, Tepid Outlook

Baird analyst Shrenik Kothari maintains Rubrik (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RBRK#NYSE">RBRK</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from $95 to $110.

RBRK

Baird Maintains Outperform on Rubrik, Raises Price Target to $110

<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/b-riley-financial-wins-nasdaq-extension-to-head-off-delisting?srnd=homepage-americas" title="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/b-riley-financial-wins-nasdaq-extension-to-head-off-delisting?srnd=homepage-americas">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/b-riley-financial-wins-nasdaq-extension-to-head-off-delisting?srnd=homepage-americas</a>

RILY

'B.Riley Financial Wins Nasdaq Extension To Head Off Delisting' - Bloomberg

Baird analyst William Power maintains Docusign (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DOCU#NASDAQ">DOCU</a>) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $93 to $85.

DOCU

Baird Maintains Neutral on Docusign, Lowers Price Target to $85

As investors intensify their search for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs">alternative methods</a> in a volatile 2025 market, Fidelity Investments has unleashed its newest tool: the Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FFUT#NASDAQ">FFUT</a>). Making its debut on June 5, FFUT is Fidelity&#8217;s response to investors demanding diversification and protection on the downside, without sacrificing liquidity.
This systematic long/short approach fund seeks to ride extended price trends across asset classes like equities, fixed income, currencies, and commodities. This makes it a possible ballast when traditional portfolios experience turbulence. The ETF takes advantage of futures, forwards, and other derivatives to execute its methodology.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/specialty-etfs/25/06/45804512/trump-musk-feud-gets-ugly-etfs-exposed-with-tesla-caught-in-the-crossfire">Trump-Musk Feud Gets Ugly: ETFs Exposed With Tesla Caught In The Crossfire</a>
FFUT Portfolio Manager Roberto Croce said this strategy was crafted to enable investors to seek capital appreciation across all markets. 
"The new managed futures strategy is designed to provide clients with an investment option that can help diversify their portfolios with the ease of an ETF wrapper,&#8221; he said.
FFUT comes to market as liquid alts are increasingly picking up steam as hedging instruments in progressively volatile markets. 
The ETF has an estimated net expense ratio of 0.80% and is commission-free through Fidelity&#8217;s online brokerage platforms for both individual investors and advisors.
With FFUT, Fidelity is doubling down on investor demand for strategies that don&#8217;t merely weather volatile markets, but rather ride the waves.
Read Next: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/new-etfs/25/06/45801050/crash-proof-investing-new-innovator-etf-promises-downside-buffer">Crash-Proof Investing? New Innovator ETF Promises Downside Buffer</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

New ETFs

FFUT

Fidelity's New Futures ETF Offers Investors A New Way To Hedge Risks

Wells Fargo analyst Michael Turrin maintains Samsara (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IOT#NYSE">IOT</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $48 to $50.

Wells Fargo Maintains Overweight on Samsara, Raises Price Target to $50

<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/trump-is-holding-back-from-calling-out-china-over-russia-war-aid" title="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/trump-is-holding-back-from-calling-out-china-over-russia-war-aid">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-06/trump-is-holding-back-from-calling-out-china-over-russia-war-aid</a>

Macro Economic Events

Politics

Global

Economics

General

'Trump Is Holding Back From Calling Out China Over Russia War Aid' - Bloomberg News

President Donald Trump&#8216;s sweeping executive order overhauling U.S. election procedures faces federal court challenges from 19 Democratic state attorneys general who argue the directive violates constitutional separation of powers and infringes on states&#8217; election authority.
What Happened: A federal hearing in Boston on Friday addressed one of three lawsuits against Trump&#8217;s March executive order requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, prohibiting mail ballots received after Election Day, and setting new voting equipment rules, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-executive-order-elections-democrats-states-8a329645f15e161103709409ecf3e746">reported</a> AP news. The order also conditions federal election grants on states adhering to strict ballot deadlines.
&#8220;The snowball of executive overreach will grow swiftly and exponentially,&#8221; former secretaries of state warned in court filings, arguing the order seeks to &#8220;unilaterally coronate the President as the country&#8217;s chief election policymaker.&#8221;
A separate federal judge in Washington D.C. already halted the citizenship requirement provision, ruling it usurped powers belonging to states and Congress. The Justice Department defended Trump&#8217;s authority to direct agencies in carrying out federal voting laws.
The order tasks the U.S. Election Assistance Commission with updating federal voter registration forms to require citizenship documentation. Similar state laws previously blocked 31,000 eligible Kansas voters from registering over a decade ago. See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/25/06/45810362/scammers-exploit-tariff-confusion-to-dupe-online-shoppers-into-paying-for-packages-that-never-arrive-bbb-warns-heres-how-to-spot-the-red-flags">Scammers Exploit Tariff Confusion To Dupe Online Shoppers Into Paying For Packages That Never Arrive, BBB Warns — Here&#8217;s How To Spot The Red Flags</a>
Why It Matters: Trump&#8217;s election directive follows other recent executive orders affecting independent institutions. His February <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/02/44005304/trumps-executive-order-could-reshape-fed-sec-and-other-financial-regulators">order subjected financial regulators</a> like the SEC and FTC to White House oversight. &#8220;The intent of this is to significantly scale back the independence of independent regulatory agencies,&#8221; said George Washington University professor Roger Nober. The election directive raises similar constitutional questions about executive power over voting procedures. The citizenship requirements could also disenfranchise eligible voters who lack accessible documentation, including married women needing both birth certificates and marriage licenses.
Image via Shutterstock Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/06/45810364/rfk-jr-champions-medical-freedom-while-curtailing-access-say-public-health-experts">RFK Jr. Champions &#8216;Medical Freedom&#8217; While Curtailing Access, Say Public Health Experts</a></li>
</ul>
Disclaimer:&nbsp;This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Trump's Election Overhaul Faces Major Legal Challenge Over State Rights And Executive Power

Wells Fargo analyst Michael Turrin maintains Docusign (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DOCU#NASDAQ">DOCU</a>) with a Underweight and raises the price target from $65 to $67.

Comments

ARK Innovation ETF

Noticias

Últimas noticias sobre ARK Innovation ETF (BATS:ARKK)

Noticias

SOCIO/CONTRIBUIDOR

BENZINGA GLOBAL